My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 219 Draft 01 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2008-2010
>
RES 219 Draft 01 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2010 8:22:43 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2008-2010
Bill/Resolution
219
Draft
01
Introducer
Pete Hoffmann, Councilmember
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC-41: Recommends adoption of Res. 219-09 - 8/18/09
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 219-09 & PC-41 - 09/02/09
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
9/2/2009
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
9/2/2009
Ayes
8-Enriques;Ford;Greenwell;Hoffmann;Naeole;Onishi;Yagong;Yoshimoto
Noes
1-Ikeda
Absent
0
Excused
0
Comments
$Bill/Resolution_Comments$
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 09/02/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE PC 08/18/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 0471.000 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2008-2010
REP PC 041 08/18/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br />"Occupancy" means (1) the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a commercial, multifamily, <br />industrial building, hotel or other structure requiring a certificate of occupancy; (2) the issuance of a building <br />permit for residential buildings that do not require a certificate of occupancy; or (3) final subdivision <br />approval for subdivisions where dwellings are allowed, but dwellings are not being constructed before sale of <br />any lot. <br />"Project area" means the area in which the project is expected to have an impact on the level of <br />service of transportation facilities. <br />"Reasonable assumptions" means the percentage of full build-out that is expected to occur during the <br />twenty-year period after the date of the application, as determined by the planning director. <br />"Transportation facilities" means State and County highways, roads, and public transportation <br />facilities. <br />"Worse than the acceptable level of service" means that the level of service at the a.m. or p.m. peak is <br />"E" or "F". <br />(d) Traffic Impact Analysis Report Required. <br />(1) A traffic impact analysis report (TIAR), prepared or updated within six months before the <br />submission of the application, shall be included with the application for any change of zone that <br />can generate fifty or more peak hour trips. The determination of peak hour trips shall be based on <br />the Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation Handbook", or any other nationally <br />recognized source. When the number of trips depends upon the exact future uses of the site, and <br />those are unknown at the time of rezoning (for example, the types of commercial uses), the <br />determination shall be based upon a typical mix of uses found in that zoning type in the <br />community. The TIAR shall be certified as having been conducted in accordance with best <br />practices by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii. <br />(2) The TIAR shall assess impacts to transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity and general <br />area of the project, and to the transportation facilities serving the project area. <br />(3) The TIAR shall include projections for future growth in traffic, for a minimum of five, ten, and <br />twenty years, and shall include other approved or proposed development that is expected to <br />impact the project area, with reasonable assumptions about the build-out of such development. <br />(4) The TIAR shall present an assessment of the impacts of the project on LOS and an evaluation of <br />alternative plans for mitigating those impacts. The evaluation shall include budgetary cost <br />estimates for the capital and operating costs of promising alternative plans. <br />(e) Mitigation Required. <br />(1) If the LOS for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently worse than the <br />acceptable level of service, or (B) projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service <br />during the five year period of the TIAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain <br />conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is <br />permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the level of service has reached the acceptable level <br />and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level. <br />(2) Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the immediate vicinity <br />of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require local mitigation. Where the deficiency in <br />LOS is due to insufficient capacity in the transportation facilities serving the project area, the <br />conditions of zoning shall require area mitigation. <br />(3) If there is more than one way to mitigate an adverse effect, the director shall present to the council <br />the pros and cons of the alternatives. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.