My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0495.000 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2008-2010
>
COM 0495.000 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 12:00:27 PM
Creation date
8/24/2009 11:01:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2008-2010
Communication
0495
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 09/16/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE COUNCIL 10/07/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE PC 09/01/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 137 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
REP PC 045 09/01/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman <br />and Members of the County Council <br />Page 11 <br />amount specified, due to the difficulty in forecasting an exact dollar amount to be <br />applied in the future. (Due to the late receipt of comments from DPW, the <br />requested changes were addressed at the hearing.) <br />After the June 30, 2009, Leeward Planning Commission meeting, the Planning <br />Department and the Director of Public Works (DPW) met to review the DPW comments <br />articulated in its June 19, 2009 memorandum. The Planning Department also reviewed <br />the draft hearing transcript to address some of the concerns expressed by the <br />Commissioners and members of the public who presented oral and written testimony. <br />The Planning Department also worked with the applicant in addressing the concerns <br />expressed at the hearing. The major concerns expressed related to the following: <br />Timing for the development of the 20 -acre park (original Condition U, new <br />Condition S): The Planning Department has determined that the applicant's <br />request to amend this condition by deferring the development of the 20 -acre park <br />until building permits are issued for 101 single-family residential units is <br />reasonable. The original'language of this condition required the 20 -acre park to <br />be developed prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit within the project. <br />2. Proposed roadways (original Condition X - new Condition V): This condition <br />was rearranged to make it more organized. The roadways are now identified by <br />names and numbers as reflected in the Kona Community Development Plan's <br />official concurrency map (Figure 4-3). <br />A. One of the concerns expressed related to the timing or lack of timing for <br />the construction of the roadways. The revised Condition V incorporates <br />the timing as to when these roadways are required to be constructed. For <br />example, the new Connector Road (Road 1 Kona CDP), which will <br />traverse through State and private properties and connect to Highway 190, <br />should be constructed no later than six (6) years after the entire right-of- <br />way beyond the applicant's property has been obtained by the County. <br />Another example, is Kamanu Street from the applicant's property to <br />Kaiminani Drive should be constructed prior to the first building for the <br />University of Hawaii is constructed on the adjacent property. <br />B. Another concern expressed related to the funding for the construction of <br />the Connector Road (Road 1). The applicant initially requested an <br />amendment that would require that the improvements for Road 1 be <br />secured by a $10 million bond or other surety. The Planning Director feels <br />that an amount should not be included in this ordinance since the amount <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.