Laserfiche WebLink
Violation of Order for Protection; Harassments; Terroristic Threatening; Probation Revocation <br />for Abuse of Household Member); 7 Circuit Court defendants with felony charges and <br />misdemeanor committals (Probation Revocation; Robbery Second Degree; Unauthorized Entry in <br />Motor Vehicle; Burglary 1St Degree; Promoting Dangerous Drugs; Assault; Abuse of Household <br />Member). This appears an all island problem with mostly East Hawaii having the most, but a114 <br />district court judges, three of the four Circuit Judges, and one Family Court Judge having "no <br />shows" in a day's sampling. Most of these misdemeanor offenses have potential, enhanced felony <br />charges for repeat convictions, such as OVUII and Abuse of Household Member; and mandatory <br />jail penalties for the violent crime offenses. <br />As noted by the one-day of sampling, there are serious concerns with an inaccurate criminal <br />history check: defendants with records would be treated as first time offenders; enhanced <br />pleadings for charges or mandatory sentencing would not be done a timely way; bail for <br />subsequent offenses would be set too low, etc. Luckily, many of the offenders are "frequent fliers" <br />within our county, so background checks rely heavily upon each agency's case management <br />system, so some of the "no shows" are discovered and appropriately booked upon a subsequent <br />arrest or court appearance. Courts have been reluctant to issue warrants or another penal summons <br />for failing to get booked (misdemeanor contempt), because these many times do not get served <br />before the offender shows up in court again on a subsequent arrest. The 2007 Judiciary Report on <br />Backlog of Warrants support that most of the 74,000 warrants backlog is for failing to comply <br />with courts. <br />HCJDC has proposed a collaborative project called the Hawaii Integrated Justice Information <br />Sharing (HIJIS). The draft Strategic Plan explains the need for "same day" updates for conviction <br />data, verified identification at every point of the criminal justice information, and integrated, "real <br />time" conviction and mental acquittal or unfitness data identification. The HIJIS Strategic Plan <br />Draft (2007-2008) and proposed Memorandum of Agreement support the need and justification <br />and demonstrate the importance of the problem and solution proposed by our application. <br />As noted in the 2007 Warrant Backlog Report, the Judiciary and other agencies had difficulty <br />getting accurate data, because the associated lack of a single, comprehensive data management <br />system. The Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center (HCJDC) has the statutory responsibility to <br />provide the Criminal Justice Agencies with this comprehensive offender based criminal history, <br />but one group that easily "falls through the cracks" are offenders brought into the court system <br />through a penal summons complaint. The case is going. through the judicial system, but <br />information is unavailable to other statewide criminal justice agencies who are not involved with <br />the case. With the ease of air travel today, many defendants do crimes away from Hawaii County, <br />but law enforcement or prosecutors would not know of a filed criminal case is pending for serious <br />offense, such as abuse of household members or OVUII. Both the judiciary and HCJDS do not <br />routinely monitor the failure of offenders who do not follow the court orders to get "booking with <br />an arrest for identification purposes upon a conviction or deferral of a criminal offense." <br />Although most offenders get processed, the more problematic offenders violate the courts' orders <br />and continue to disregard their responsibilities to the justice system. As noted in 2007 Backlog <br />Warrants Report, the problem of failing to follow court orders is significantly attributed to a small <br />number of multiple, repeat offenders (40 percent,), who are manipulative, and do not respond <br />because there is no immediate and consistent, effective consequences, and continues the public <br />apathy and lack of respect for the judicial system. As noted, the one day sampling shows that <br />AG/CPJAD #i(a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 2 <br />