Laserfiche WebLink
24. Fire Department: (See Exhibit B -June 24, 1996 Memo) <br /> Applicant's Response: (See Exhibit C -July 16, 1996 Letter) <br /> 25. Police Department (June 21, 1996 Memo): <br /> "We have reviewed the application for a change of zone and do not believe the request <br /> will negatively impact traffic or safety conditions in the area." <br /> 26. Real Property Tax Office (July 1, 1996 Memo): <br /> "There is no agricultural use on the subject property. The taxes are current." <br /> 27. Department of Water Supply: (See Exhibit D -June 21, 1996, Exhibit E -July 24, <br /> 1996, Exhibit F -August 19, 1996 Memos) <br /> Applicant's Response: (See Exhibit G -July 16, 1996 Letter) <br /> 28. Department of Transportation (June 27, 1996 Letter): <br /> "Thank you for consulting us. The proposed zone change will not significantly affect <br /> State highway facilities." <br /> <br /> 29. Department of Public Works (October 21, 1996 Memo): <br /> "We have reviewed the subject application and our comments are as follows: <br /> 1. All development generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be <br /> directed toward any adjacent properties. <br /> 2. A drainage study should be prepared and a drainage system should be installed <br /> meeting with the approval of DPW. <br /> 3. All grading and grubbing activities shall comply with Chapter 10 of the Hawaii <br /> County Code. <br /> 4. The proposed roadway must conform to County standards. The sight distance must <br /> meet the requirements of the Statewide Design Manual. <br /> <br /> 30. Department of Land and Natural Resources-Land Division (June 26, 1996 Memo): <br /> "We have no comments." <br /> -4- <br /> <br />