COM 0337.000 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

F, H and N. However, they disagreed with the applicant's request to delete Condition E, which requires the applicant to submit a Traffic TIAR to the State DOT for review and approval prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval. DOT further indicated that they did not consider the applicant's justification of Condition G's requirement that the applicant construct any improvements to Puainako Street that may be required by DOT to be sufficient. DOT further stated that subsequent TIARs should include a discussion of a development's impact on Kano elehua/Puainako Street intersection and Kekela Street/Puainako Street intersection. DOT also stated that the Site Plan included within the TIAR did not reflect the report's recommendations. Finally, DOT indicated that no additional access would be permitted from the property to Puainako Street. The applicant's 2017 amendment request represented that the applicant wished to keep the Puainako Street access right-in/right-out limitation intact, however by letter dated January 16, 2019, the applicant changed course and requested an amendment to Condition G to allow full-movement access to the project site from Puainako Street. The request was accompanied by an updated TZAR recommending mitigation to both Puainako Street and Kekela Street to accommodate the request. Additionally, DOT submitted a letter approving the updated TIAR and the proposed mitigation therein. However, by letter dated May 22, 2019, the applicant withdrew that amendment request citing concerns by KTA over potential negative traffic impacts to KTA patrons from the proposed full-access driveway. This letter was accompanied by an updated TIAR dated May 20, 2019, however, with the exception of a new site plan and a new site access evaluation section describing proposed new striping treatments for Puainako Street an limitation of access from Puainako Street to a single driveway(starting on page 52), the TIAR is nearly identical to the report submitted in 2017, including all of the same traffic data, analyses, and recommendations. Please note, as the majority of the TIARs are identical, we will only include the pages that are different from the 2017 TIAR (P.D. Exhibit 6—May 22, 2019 letter and Updated TIAR Pages) The DPW-Traffic Division replied with a "no comment" on the original request for. comments on the project in 2017. By email dated May 17, 2019, DPW-Traffic Division -7-