Laserfiche WebLink
if they so choose, but this gives them the ability to at least, to discuss that for traffic circulation <br />within and around the project. <br />Condition P, the present traffic study is an analysis of the project at full build out. A revised <br />study of the impacts for the various phases will be given to the Department of Public Works, <br />and we suggest the condition read that "The schedule for the construction of the following <br />improvements and any credits due the developer for their construction shall be approved by the <br />Department of Public Works." And this will allow the Department to determine which <br />improvements they want constructed at which time and allow the Department also to consider <br />there are several project improvements to roadways that were requested by the traffic study, <br />even if the project was not done. There's substantial impact by the construction of the Saddle <br />Road, that they anticipate the traffic on the Saddle Road going from somewhere in the <br />neighborhood of 350 to 400 to 6,000 in the construction period. All of this is outside the <br />project scope, not a result of what's happening on the project, so we would be able to <br />coordinate with Public Works on the construction schedule and approvals. <br />Condition X, we'd add a new sentence that "The cost of land and improvements shall be <br />credited to the developer as part of their fair share contributions as set forth in Condition LL <br />and Condition KK. The developer shall make a fair share contribution to the Department of <br />education pursuant to a uniform policy adopted by the Board of Education and uniformly <br />` <br />applied in the County of Hawaii." We don't have any objection to making a fair share <br />contribution, but we think it should be pursuant to some kind of policy that is adopted by the <br />Board of Education and uniformly applied, not an ad hoc condition. The way the condition <br />reads now, it literally puts the project at the mercy of the Board of Education, and so they can <br />ask for whatever they want and without regards to the reasonableness or the actual impact <br />generated by the project. <br />These basically are our comments. We think the rest of the conditions are things that we can <br />live with and will surely help both the project and the community. Thank you very much for <br />the opportunity, and I'll be available to answer questions or our consultants. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioners, do you have any questions with the Applicant's <br />representative? Director, do you have any questions? Commissioner Springer, go ahead. <br />SPRINGER:To the Applicant's representatives. We routinely address requests for <br />time extensions to approve projects based on financial hardships. Can you discuss with us <br />your reasons for financial optimism, anticipating the completion of the proposed project by <br />2014? <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Yamashiro. <br />YAMASHIRO:What we're looking at is the stated growth by the university for an <br />` <br />additional 2,000 students just at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. We have met with the <br />8 <br /> <br />