My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-20 TLava Kuakini
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-20 TLava Kuakini
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:34:40 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:34:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Thank you. Im wondering if Mr. Emler might be able to speak into the <br />th <br />discussion regarding the September 26 memo from the Department of Public Works and having <br />heard the Planning Directors response to those concerns does that ameliorate the concerns that <br />you raised in the memo? <br />th <br />EMLER:Well the reason for the comments beginning on my September 26 and <br />th <br />then following up with a revised memo dated, you got that, dated November 28, 2005, should <br />be on the record. We didnt actually-. I think theres been some perhaps misreading of our <br />comments or not fully getting the, an understanding of the comment because what I said was to <br />avoid environmental conflicts and not necessarily focusing just on traffic issues. Traffic is an <br />issue always of course and we made general comments to the traffic issues under the traffic <br />heading there, recommending that, well just saying that a Traffic Impact Analysis was warranted <br />because of the number of units but-. And thats to identify improvements that would be needed <br />to Kuakini Highway or Alii Highway, the Alii Highway connection there. To identify those type <br />of improvements or impacts to the infrastructure. But the reason for our comment was because <br />were planning these projects right there. And 4 lane highway fronting it with a large drainage <br />project, a 5 box, 5-2 box culvert right there, right in the front of the project for Waiaha drainage <br />way. Also the Alii Highway, Kahului to Keauhou Parkway project, which is going to involve a <br />lotofearthmovingandsoforthandofcourseyouhavealotofenvironmentalproblemswith <br />residence along those alignments when we want to come in and put in roads. We dont want to <br />have, I dont think we want to approve something that is going to possibly create problems <br />increase the cost for us to put in our projects and generate complaints thats going to make it <br />more difficult for us to get our project done. Because the County will be the developer of those <br />projects and well be expected to mitigate the impacts from them. Does that explain for you? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer follow up? <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Emler is there a timetable for these proposed, various <br />proposed actions by the County? <br />EMLER:The Kuakini Highway widening Phase II project is in the planning phase <br />right now. The earliest we propose to begin construction on that would be late 2008, beginning <br />2009. The Alii Highway, Kahului to Keauhou Project my understanding of that is its not in the <br />current STIP schedule for this next 3-year schedule. Although Phase II could be put back in at <br />any time should we have a resolution of some issues on that. The Phase I which is the part that is <br />fronting this project I believe would not come up until the next 3-year improvement project <br />phase I could be wrong about that. I wanted to, I tried to make a phone call before this meeting <br />cause I figured the question was going to come up but I wasnt able to get through to check that. <br />Im sorry I dont have a definite answer on that. <br />SPRINGER:And the drainage? <br />EMLER:The drainage project could be either part of the Alii Highway project or <br />Kuakini widening project depending on which one comes first we would handle that under one <br />of those contracts. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.