My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (8th Session Part 1)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021-11-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (8th Session Part 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2022 11:16:43 AM
Creation date
2/15/2022 9:54:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KOSSOW: Commissioner Bath, if I can just give some clarification to that. In the last <br /> meeting, we did work on the draft that we all worked on, and then we also added this map <br /> onto it. So, that way we can have two actively working drafts, instead of just one. So, for <br /> clarification purposes, that was what we decided in the last meeting. Is there any other <br /> discussion? <br /> LOPEZ: Yes. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Lopez. <br /> LOPEZ: I have to strongly agree with comments made by Commissioner Hustace here. If <br /> you start shifting, as some of the comments made, then the whole thing gets thrown off. <br /> Again, the domino effect. The census blocks adjoining some of these, majority of these <br /> districts, are so large that a slight change just throws everything out of whack. It's <br /> important that we listen to the feelings of the community and where people are most <br /> comfortable with relationships. But we can't ignore the deviations because that's the <br /> legal basis by which we have to operate. So, there's going to be some give and take. <br /> From my observation of this map and testimonies, comments rather, that have been given <br /> here, this is a very workable map without totally throwing it out and starting with another <br /> version. So, I support Mr. Hustace's comments. Thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Mr. Lopez. Any further discussion? Mr. Hustace. <br /> HUSTACE: Thank you, Chair. I was wondering if we could bring up the iteration I made <br /> after this draft. If that's alright, Chair. If it's allowable. <br /> KOSSOW: This is 9.1? <br /> HUSTACE: That's correct. <br /> KOSSOW: Staff, is that available? (No audible response heard; Staffprojected map 9.1 <br /> onto the screen.) <br /> HUSTACE: And Chair if I may discuss this a little bit? <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Hustace. <br /> HUSTACE: Thank you. So as I mentioned, in hopes of creating different working drafts, <br /> following the first one, like different iterations, I submitted this one here. Taking into <br /> consideration the request made for the eastern portion of the island, in the Puna area. As <br /> well as, parts of the western side, of particular with Alii Drive. So, if we could start with <br /> the Puna area. This is Working Draft 2. This is basically,just manipulating the boundary <br /> lines between Council 4 and 5. There were no other changes, so if we just focus on this <br /> area. There were no other changes regarding the boundary lines between 6, 3, and 2 <br /> nearby. But 4 and 5 just did a switch here. So, Council 5 sweeps all, mostly on the coastal <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.