|
HAYASHI: Could you use the mike, please.
<br />W. MINSON: Yeah, there’re basically twelve stalls in Phase I that’s existing on the
<br />upper right hand corner up on the second level there. On the left side the encroachment would
<br />take out another probably 15 stalls and the loading zone, so we would no longer have the loading
<br />zone for the upper levels as well. So the landscape strip between Kamanu Street and the parking
<br />stalls there is that strip that’s ten-foot wide right there, so that would have to disappear, if we
<br />keep our parking, or if Planning continued with the requirement of a ten-foot landscape strip, we
<br />would have to take out the parking. So one of the two has to go -.
<br />WATANABE: Okay, so, so, now, wait. Okay, okay. Now you are clarifying it a little
<br />better. So in other words, what’s you are saying is, to accommodate the landscaping requirement
<br />as well as the ten-foot future road widening easement, that would eliminate the parking, the
<br />mauka parking, approximately someplace between 20 and 30.
<br />W. MINSON: Yeah, well, we need the, they need to gain ten feet, and that’s if -. Now the
<br />way I understand it, this dedication of the ten-foot setback is a just-in-case-what-if-we-maybe-
<br />need-it; it’s not an issue right now that is required to widen the road. The one thing that we
<br />missed and we haven’t found out yet: If you are familiar with that intersection, TSA developed
<br />the – can we go back to the big project with TSA, one of the first ones, yeah, that – our subject
<br />property, if you notice across the street from our subject property going east where the pointer is,
<br />that big, huge retaining wall they just put in, that is set back now 20 feet. A talk with Ki, my
<br />understanding is they needed 80-foot road widening to run the length of Kamanu to
<br />accommodate I believe it’s your condition F in the Kailua Community Development Plan (sic),
<br />which would send Kamanu down to the harbor intersection and give that a southerly exit. So
<br />that widening in front of our property on the east side, mauka facing, does exist now with the
<br />TSA’s dedication of that 20-foot, is 80 feet now. So we are confused with, they road-wise 80
<br />feet, as we told that, and explained to us that was needed, and then they are still looking for ten
<br />more feet of our property. So we are not sure where this is going, and it’s a little awkward for
<br />us.
<br />WATANABE: Okay, but let’s clarify one thing first, and then I don’t want to dominate
<br />the conversation, so we will open it up for other questions from other people. But you know,
<br />again, Maija, the encroachment into the existing parking or planned parking would only occur, if
<br />we also require the ten-foot planting screen or landscaping? Is that correct? Or would that take
<br />it without any landscaping right through about midway of those existing parking stalls?
<br />COTTLE: With the ten-foot easement for road widening purposes, it would encroach
<br />into the existing parking lot.
<br />WATANABE: Without landscaping, without accounting for any landscaping?
<br />COTTLE: Without accounting for landscaping.
<br />WATANABE: Okay, okay, okay. Mr. Woodward.
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />6
<br />
<br />
|