2006-02-24 TRoyal_ALII_SMA05007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

talked about and I concur with Commissioner McCalls concerns and I share them and if you have any. You know I guess what I would like to know from the applicant is whether or not youre willing to you know have this additional ethnographic information provided really before we consider the approval of this SMA application? GRAHAM:Go ahead please Mr. Lau. LAU:Thank you. Yes we are willing to have the information prepared. Perhaps the best way to handle this would be to defer any decision that you make until the next Planning Commission hearing assuming that we can get on the calendar for the next hearing. And at that time I will have our archaeologist here and hopefully by that time he will be able to give us some information to address the concerns that Commissioner Springer had. GRAHAM:Thank you Commissioner Springer? SPRINGER:Great, thank you, thank you for that initiative on your part. And so Id like to make some additional comments. GRAHAM:Please. SPRINGER:And Commissioner Graham with regard to your concerns thats one of the reasons that I would have hoped for at least a general discussion of the trail beyond the bounds of this parcel being considered. Im not necessarily in favor of exercising authoritative muscle and requiring public access for the point of flexing that muscle. I dont know the disposition of the trail beyond the bounds of the subject property so I, I would hope that that would be included in the discussion so that we have that bigger picture of the trail. That would be very helpful for me at least in analyzing that portion of my concerns so thank you Mr. Lau and Mr. Chair as well. GRAHAM:Do we have anything further from the Commissioners? Mr. Lau my only thought on the discussion weve had is that there may be more that were kind of asking for than what you can just pull together for the next meeting. I certainly have the Judd trail concerns as well as well as the whole site base concerns here. Mr. Torigoe I dont run into it. It seems likely, unlikely to me that were going to if we voted on the application now regardless of the conditions that we would have a clear decision one way or the other. Can you give us an idea of what our options might be? I dont want to overrun Statute of Limitations or. TORIGOE:Okay looking at your Planning Commission rule 9, (inaudible) steps of permits. Boy this is a long rule. 9-11 E speaks of the time limits basically youre supposed to make a decision within 30 calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing. At this point the hearing is not concluded sounds like youre planning to continue or defer it. So the clock really wouldnotbetickingatthispoint. GRAHAM:SoCommissionerSpringer? SPRINGER:Finish,Imsorry. EXHIBIT 21