My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-24 TRoyal_ALII_SMA05007
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-24 TRoyal_ALII_SMA05007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:14:30 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:14:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:So I was just going to say that if were agreed to defer the hearing Im sure <br />we could do that. I mean I believe we could do that if the Commission wanted. Then it would <br />seem to me to be incumbent upon us as Commissioners to let you know, you know what we were <br />expecting so that at least in the meantime you can work towards what we feel we need. <br />Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:I dont know if its in order or not I would move that in the further, that this <br />hearing be continued on this application to the next date that staff can fit this in. <br />GRAHAM:I would suggest maybe that we do it until the applicant feels ready to <br />continue once weve let him know what were needing to have. <br />IWASHITA:Oh either way I guess my sense was that Mr. Lau was wanting to keep the <br />process moving and but if its the sense of the body that you know that I guess further <br />information should be considered by (inaudible) and maybe checking with your archaeologist so <br />forth to get a better sense of what kind of time frame youre looking at for a continuance and <br />thats fine too. So but I just wanted to make it clear by the motion by the statements from the <br />applicant that the applicant agrees to the continuation of this hearing and then we do it by <br />motion. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you so that is a motion? <br />IWASHITA:Yes. <br />GRAHAM:And do we have a second? <br />MCCALL:Second. <br />GRAHAM:Seconded by Commissioner McCall. Should we finish the motion and <br />then discuss what wed like to have brought forward? Okay any discussion on the motion? <br />IWASHITA:Id just like to make clear on the record Mr. Lau you agree with the <br />continuation on this hearing and so we can have these further considerations addressed? <br />LAU:Yes we agree to the continuation. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. <br />GRAHAM:My sense is procedurally that we would vote on having the continuation <br />and then before we close the hearing on this matter that we let Mr. Lau know what it is were <br />hopingtoreceivebeforewetakeitupagain.Isthatagreeable?Isthatwhatyouallunderstand <br />over here? Mr. Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Might you just make Mr. Lau aware of what you want him or what you <br />wouldexpectduringthediscussionofthis,themotionthatsalreadythere?Andthenonceyou <br />vote on that then were done with this. <br />EXHIBIT <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.