2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

greatly to see bulldozing done when the sites are so special. I also live on an Ag level that according to the maps and you know these maps I wanted to point out that the tax map which says January 2005 is ancient. I mean I know theres been more recent ones done because it shows Mr. Normans property is being this huge big long property. It was broken up years and years ago I think 30 years ago, you know its a long time ago. So this tax map is ancient. I wanted to address a few things on here first of all. I want to address that because it is in the book. I wanted to ask a question and maybe I should ask that first so that people can find it. Id like to know where site, archaeological site 19056, where the description is. In their outline here I couldnt find it I got to 15053 and then it jumped to 1136. So if the description of that one that theyre planning on saving can be found Id appreciate that. Thats why I have the notebook here. Im going to make several comments because there has been some things that are being addressed here and one of the things asking about Mr. Normans letter and his request and his, he does when he sold his land he kept easements a 40 foot easement on the properties. Its kind of an isolated easement because the Komos and the Otas up above him in no way are going to give a40-footeasement.Butalsoifyouaskforastubout,thestuboutwouldcomerightinthemidst of the property and that stub out does not connect with Mr. Normans easements that he was proposing in that multi-colored sheet that he gave you. GRAHAM;Excuse me Ms. Stanbro, are you talking about the very mauka end of the parcel? STANBRO:Very mauka end of the parcel. The where you were wanting to do the stub out that stub out would be on the road, I dont know exactly what its referred to but its where the old Onizuka Store is. Thats an extremely, extremely narrow little road, which has houses right up to the edge of the road. And theres no way and theyre very long skinny properties. Theres no way that you would be doing a continuation mauka-makai road there because its peoples homes. On the other side of Mr. Norman where he was proposing it if you look at the map his land is, borders where his easement might be, borders clear over on the far left corner of the property there. So, the thing that he was giving you is not feasible. I do know that the properties mauka of him I am on the north side. Ive asked the Bertrams, Peters and Otas are all people that are concerned about his proposed increasing our roads. Our farms are very productive farms. We have coffee, avocado, you name it right up to the border of that narrow old road. And in fact Komos property if you ever thought of continuing up there would be totally obliterated. So, Im you know Im thinking that the plan that they have of finishing at the top of the road as a very viable one and if youre considering a mauka-makai corridor you go back over to Keauhou or Keopuka and make use of that huge corridor thats already there. And come on down to wherever youre going to be coming down with that corridor already there. If you step out to the end theres no place to go once you get, once you head up towards Mamalahoa Highway. Are there any, is that at all clear if you look at the map? And if you look at the map you can see how narrow the Onizuka property is right there then to widen to do a County road there would be-. GRAHAM:Hold on a second please. Commissioner Iwashita? IWASHITA:No, when shes done I had a question. EXHIBIT E 22