Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: In Recommendation 12, I guess, the question is in the process of plan review, <br /> where does HELCO review to establish grid capability come into the review of a retrofit for an <br /> existing structure? <br /> KERN: HELCO is not generally involved in the Plan Approval process. That would probably <br /> be something that would be worked out by the owner or lessee prior, as they would know that <br /> that requirement coming in so that they would have to work with HELLO, or whatever operator, <br /> to provide that infrastructure even if they are creating their own power source, right? So they <br /> would have to solve for how they would meet this criteria, and then we would verify it from the <br /> Plan Approval that they have the right number of stalls on their plan, and then before they get a <br /> certificate of occupancy, we would go back out and verify that those plugs and stalls are actually <br /> there. But we actually don't get involved in the HELCO portion of it. <br /> VITOUSEK: So the adequacy of the existing electrical infrastructure would have to be <br /> established by the applicant who is applying for it? And so they'd be coming in saying they've <br /> consulted with HELCO and they've determined that there is adequate or there is not adequate <br /> electrical infrastructure to allow the charging stations? <br /> KAY: So I think we would likely require some evidence from HELCO and not just their word <br /> VITOUSEK: Right— <br /> KAY: <br /> ightKAY: —say, yes, this is a situation here where we are going to try and apply for the exemption <br /> under the law, but, so it may be helpful, similar to the aggregation principle, to add some <br /> language in there to say we need some evidence, if they are going to be coming in and claiming <br /> an exception. So the FIRM, the FIRM map is pretty easy for us to look at, but something, some <br /> evidence from the provider to say, hey, we don't have the requisite capability for the <br /> infrastructure here <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, that was <br /> KAY: please give us the variance, please give us the exemption. <br /> VITOUSEK: If there could be language in there that qualifies review by the utility in <br /> determining whether or not adequate electrical service exists for the area. <br /> KIMBALL: That makes sense, no problem, okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: And if Jennifer from HELCO wants to weigh in on that, please do. No? Okay. <br /> Let's see, now, the question that Vice Chair DeFranco raised briefly about the source of power, I <br /> think is a good thing again to be looking out in the future, because it doesn't make sense to be <br /> charging an electric vehicle by burning a fossil fuel; it serves the same thing as burning a fossil <br /> fuel. So if there is ways of coordinating the use of energy and charging at times when the solar <br /> renewable resources are available. I don't know if that could be built in here. <br /> 21 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />