My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-17 thaks
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-17 thaks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:52:33 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:52:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
time any exit out onto Laukapu Street for the first parcel, you know, would, I guess, <br />from the Applicant's standpoint, not be realistic. So we would respectfully request at <br />least for the Department and the Commission to consider, if you can find that prudent, <br />to delete Condition E in its entirety, and on Condition I, to delete the reference to <br />Parcel No. 38. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, was that considered in drafting up the <br />recommendations? <br />FUKE:Basically, what -. I'm sorry. Yeah. Basically, what the <br />Applicant is therefore asking is that to have that first parcel be treated in the same way <br />as how the recommended conditions for the Kitagawa property. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Fuke, your Applicant, the Applicant is proposing to treat <br />both parcels separately so he can -. <br />FUKE:Correct. <br />GALDONES:Conduct separate -? <br />FUKE:Correct. <br />GALDONES:Activities? <br />FUKE:It's that factor, combined with the fact that there is a significant <br />grade separation between the two parcels. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, well, maybe it's Public Works who came up with that <br />recommendation. Would you have any knowledge how that was treated by the Public <br />Works, or was this directed by the, your Department? <br />KAWAHA:No, this was the Department's recommendation that there be a, <br />because to prohibit that access and, to have that internal circulation among those two <br />developments. So I didn't have any discussion as far as not prohibiting the access from <br />that corner lot. <br />YUEN:Well, we do want to try to have this internal circulation and limit <br />the number of access points to the side streets. Let me just clarify what you are asking <br />here. On Parcel -. <br />FUKE:Thirty-seven is the corner lot, yeah. <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.