2003-04-17 thaks - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

YUEN:Thirty-seven, the corner lot, which is the higher lot, you want to come out, you want each, 37 and 38 both to have separate driveway entrances to Laukapu Street and you could go left or right from either driveway? FUKE:That's correct. That's correct. YUEN:Didn't Public Works have a comment about the closeness of a driveway on 37 to the intersection and the distance that we would want from the intersection there? FUKE:Exhibit D of your Background Report, Mr. Director, is the Public Works' comment. And on Item No. 4, they just note that Kwili Street is a secondary arterial with an existing right-of-way of 80 feet. Because Kwili Street is an ` arterial and the development's proximity to Makaala Street, access should be limited to Laukapu Street. The plan that was presented to the, you know, in conjunction with the application, reflected full movement access on Kwili Street for the corner parcel, as well as full movement access for the two separate parcels on Laukapu Street. And I believe this is what Department of Public Works was referring to. YUEN:Does someone have the photographs? I'd like to look at those again. GALDONES:Mr. Fuke, looking at the plan, the site plan drawing, if you would propose full access for both properties, what does that do to the property? FUKE:First of all, I think if the condition, you know, like in terms of limiting access on Kwili Street is accepted, then there may have to be some rearrangement to the building, you know. Because this is, this layout was predicated upon a full turn in movement on Kwili Street, as well as full turn in movement on Laukapu Street. So if you're going to have only like limited only to a right turn in movement, then, you know, obviously you have some, you know, he may want to angle the parking or something like that, you know. And the building may put his loading zone over here rather than the loading zone over here, you know, that kind of stuff so -. But, at any rate, as originally proposed, we want to have a full movement over here, full movement over here, and full movement on the farthest end of the other property. What the Applicant is requesting is not to necessarily mandate that there be a connection because of that grade difference, coupled with the fact that, you know, they want to develop it as two separate entities. Now if in the end it turns out that they want to spend that, you know, inordinate amount of money to make that kind of connection and have only one consolidated access, they want that to be an option, but not be a mandate. 5