Laserfiche WebLink
HAYASHI:Mr. Chair? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Mr. Hayashi. <br />HAYASHI:For clarification purposes of this proposed condition, may I ask the <br />applicant as to what is meant by futurecommercial use? Does that also include the existing <br />Single-Family dwelling that would be converted to Commercial use or it does not include that <br />particular building? <br />ZELKO:No, it does not include the building that is already there. It would be for <br />future buildings. <br />HAYASHI:So it€s future buildings? <br />ZELKO:If there was ever future development on there, then the requirement, it <br />wouldbeconditionedonthat. <br />HAYASHI:IfthatisthecasethenIdon€tthinkthePlanningDirectorwouldbeableto <br />support that particular change. If perhaps the word future‚ was deleted, then perhaps that could <br />meet the intent of what we had proposed. <br />ZELKO:Okay. I think one of the issues is the certificate of occupancy for the <br />building that is already there, I mean conditioning it on that. <br />HAYASHI:Yes. But in order to use the particular building -. You had a certificate of <br />occupancy for a single family dwelling. But if you were to convert that to commercial use as the <br />applicant intended to do, then they would have to come in for plan approval, that sort of thing, to <br />convert that particular building from a single-family dwelling to a commercial building. And at <br />that time when all of the requirements are completed then a certificate of occupancy would be <br />issued for that new commercial use. <br />ZELKO:In looking at one of the changes of zone ordinance for right down the <br />road, which was Matsuno, I don€t know Sue if you want to point it out on the map up there, they <br />were doing a change of zone on a much larger parcel than we were doing to CN-20. And the <br />condition wasn€t as extensive as the one we were seeing for this; and that was our concern. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Just to follow-up on what Mr. Hayashi is saying, you€re trying to exempt <br />the existing building from fire flow or fire protection requirements so that you can have <br />commercial use on the existing building? <br />ZELKO:Well, one of the things, I guess the issue is if it isn€t so specific we would <br />be okay with it. It was a very extensive requirement for a 5800-square foot office building. And <br />we were saying because it was so specific you had to do the second line from Komohana all the <br />way down. That€s about 400 feet, I believe. And if it wasn€t so specific and we could go back to <br />5EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />