2007-05-04 TPITTULO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the Fire Department and ask for an allowance to do maybe the automatic sprinkler system, then I believe we would be okay with that on the existing building, would be fine. YUEN:Yeah, I think wed be willing to have a condition that if you meet the Fire Departments requirements for fire protection on any commercial building including the existing building we could modify the condition. But the question that Mr. Hayashi was asking you and that I just asked you again was, it sounded like you were trying to avoid those requirements on the existing building. ZELKO:No. We certainly want to do what the Fire Department requires. It was just the specifics of this second 8-inch waterline, if we could just put the language in there that says we will follow what the Fire Department says if theres another alternative, since thats what DWS had said in their letter, their agency comment, that there may be other alternatives. HAYASHI:Iguesstheconcernthatwehaveisthewordfuture.Andasindicated earlier when I asked you the question, your intent was to not have the existing structure which would be converted to a commercial establishment or commercial use not comply with this particular condition. Or did I misunderstand your response? ZELKO:Yes. Because I think our main concern was the specifics of that second 8- inch waterline since we were only talking about one building and were not doing a big apartment building or anything like that in the area. So as long as it wasnt specific were okay with doing it, were okay. We would like, I mean were going to follow the Fire Department. HAYASHI:Yes, I understand that portion. The concern we have is the word future. And if youre willing to take out the word future then perhaps we can agree with what youre proposing and give you that other alternative that youre seeking. ZELKO:Okay, yes, I understand that. (Discussion off the record with applicant.) Im sorry, Commissioners. GRAHAM:Yeah, its all right. Go right ahead. PITTULLO:Hello? GRAHAM:Yes, sir. PITTULLO:Basic question -. We want to do everything up to Code as far as the Fire Inspector said. And just the occupancy of the building, Ive already done -. It started as a single- family residence for my family, my mom, and my wife and child. And I planned to convert it, you know, to use it for office space. Im a farmer, Im also a builder. So I guess the main question for me is were about two to three weeks away from getting it finalized. Is this going to hang up the final on the house where we can have occupancy just for my family? GRAHAM:I think Mr. Hayashi can respond. HAYASHI:Yeah, if youre going to be using that particular building as a single- family dwelling then sure you can get your occupancy. But once you intend to convert that to a 6EXHIBIT B