My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TBeltcollins
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TBeltcollins
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:57:47 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:57:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:So you cant really do much for infrastructure for less than $125,000. <br />HAYASHI:Thats correct. And I guess, I dont know what the original intent was. <br />But I think when they came in thats one of the things that the Planning Department took into <br />consideration when reviewing the SMA Permit, that this particular improvement would be less <br />than $125,000. I guess based on this new proposal, they determined that the improvement costs <br />would be much more than that. This is why theyre now coming for the SMA Permit which <br />would also cover the infrastructural improvements for the initial subdivision that was granted <br />under that minor permit. <br />GRAHAM:So maybe the original Planning Department prior to the current <br />administration, I guess, approved as a minor because they didnt include the infrastructure and <br />now the infrastructure for that first approval is kind of being included with this one? Is that kind <br />of right? <br />HAYASHI:Well, back then it might have been, I mean the applicant felt that perhaps <br />theycouldmaketheimprovementswithinthe$125,000improvementcost.Afterreevaluation,I <br />guess, they felt that it would cost much more than what they initially had proposed; and this is <br />why they wanted to include these two existing cul-de-sacs that were previously approved under <br />the minor permit as part of this particular SMA Permit. <br />GRAHAM:Okay, thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Ive got one question on that. Well, according to this, were looking at a <br />20-foot wide lateral shoreline public access. I believe thats correct, yeah. And I guess my <br />question is, you know, like a lot of these areas are like cliffs so, you know, through erosion, <br />natural erosion, a cliff falls over, where is the access? <br />HAYASHI:That has to be determined at later date. There is a delineation on the <br />subdivision plans; but the actual delineation would be done at a much later time; and they would <br />have to submit those plans to the Planning Director for approval. <br />WATANABE:Okay, thank you. <br />HAYASHI:And just for your information, while these areas may be at a cliff in certain <br />places, you know, there are a lot of people that go down there for fishing; and whether they fish <br />off the cliffs or there are lower areas, thats -. <br />WATANABE:Up to them. <br />HAYASHI:Yes. <br />WATANABE:Okay. <br />HAYASHI:Id also like to point out that as part of our conditions, if youll note, that <br />we are requiring additional setbacks greater than what is normally required. And if you look at <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.