Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board <br />October 27, 2022 <br />MR. KUNZ: I have a quick question or comment—I'm not sure what's going to come out—but <br />I like what you just said. And then, on the flip -side, it's like be careful what you wish for <br />because then, if you start getting all these people coming in that we need so desperately and <br />you're short-staffed to process them, then we're back at this catch-22 thing. <br />So, I admire, I think the direction because the shortage of getting qualified applicants in to fill a <br />lot of the jobs—at the same time, then it falls back on the department—your department to drive <br />those new applications forward. <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Right. <br />MR. KUNZ: So, it'sI'm not sure the strategy that how that's going to play out. Hopefully, <br />they both play out and you have staff back in on board where they're helped. <br />The other comment I wanted to, kind of, throw in there was—is there—are you able to see, like, <br />where everything was a year -and -a -half ago, let's say, 18 months? And what percentage or the <br />level of progress that recruiting and processing and getting people in positions, like, let's say a <br />year ago—compared to, like, now. If there has been an improvement? Is it trending that it's <br />improving? Or is it still, kind of, maybeI don't want to use the word "spiraling"but more <br />challenging? Or do you see it changing that there's a wave of change where there's, like, "Oh, <br />we're taking care of more people. We are—we see that we've been able to fill more"—or is it <br />getting harder and harder with all the different circumstancesstaffing, recruitment—and if you <br />do I know it's going to be hard to predict whether or not you can see that trend changing for the <br />better or for the worse. <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Okay. So, yes, we can. And that's part of the package is the metrics, <br />right. So, we propose implementing all of these things but it's great to have all these things in <br />place—but we also want to make sure that it's actually working. <br />So, the system that we haveNeoGov—does offer a report—it's a "Time to Hire Report." <br />Basically, it picks up on all those points that you mentioned. And we can do a comparison. I <br />haven't had the opportunity to do it. I don't have access to NeoGov as the director, but that's, <br />definitely, part of our reporting and we are moving into that because we've already initiated. I <br />think it's been a couple months since we initiated a lot of these new engagements. So, want to <br />monitor that and then take some metrics at that point. <br />So, yes, we do have that opportunity and I think those points are very valid. And your first point <br />about the unintended consequences our staff could experience with all these new efforts, we've <br />been engaging with the recruitment staff as much as possible pretty regularly—and that <br />concern has come up. And so, we're monitoring. We're paying close attention to any kind of <br />spike or anything like that, so we can try and address it as best as possible. But, yes, we have <br />recognized that. So, thank you. <br />MR. KUNZ: Will the department ever get to a point where you come so saturated with <br />recruitment, which is a good problem to have where people are applying that it actually will <br />Page 12 <br />