Laserfiche WebLink
M. ROY:Madam Chair, I've been trying to -. <br />GIFFIN:Mikahala, please. <br />M. ROY:It's Mikahala. I just wanted to say that there was heavy discussion <br />on that matter, and it was brought up perhaps by the, one of ourselves; but then there was <br />active discussion on that. <br />GIFFIN:Was it when Ms. Yent spoke? Was it during that time? Be <br />it was, I have that area marked in my minutes? <br />VITOUSEK:It was the architect, I think. <br />GIFFIN:Was it the architect? <br />M. ROY:I agree with Mr. Vitousek. I believe it was when the architect <br />spoke. <br />VITOUSEK:I think he said what, he was describing what site work would be <br />required. That's the best of my recollection but I -. <br />GIFFIN:Was that on the first or the second day? <br />VITOUSEK:We've had two days, I think it was on the first day. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. <br />VITOUSEK:I think so. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. If that's the case, you can look at that discussion in your <br />minutes. All right. Ms. Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. With regard to your supplemental testimony, that one <br />volcanic glass piece, was the glass worked? <br />RECHTMAN:No. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. In your references cited from your report that's a part <br />of the application, I see no citation of "Exalted Sits the Chief" or the Kanahele piece that <br />was prepared for State Parks, both of which include information relevant to Kamoa, if <br />we're calling Kamoa Point complex the whole complex, as well as <br />associated with this region. Can you explain to us why those were excluded? <br />RECHTMAN:They weren't necessarily excluded. The report was an assessment <br />report as opposed to an archaeological inventory survey. So the level of background <br />research for an assessment report is somewhat less than that for an inventory survey. <br />26 <br /> <br />