My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-07-02 TISHIMARU
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-07-02 TISHIMARU
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:08:42 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:08:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In terms of the archaeological aspects, I had submitted a statement from former Professor <br />William Bonk who did the survey of that area which was then subsequently accepted and <br />further confirmed by, today, by the State Historic Preservation Office as being no historic <br />properties being affected. No additional archaeological study was done since the study <br />that was done by Professor Bonk. <br />The size of the quarry, contrary to what has being alluded to, is not really, you know, <br />although the request is for like 12 acres, the 12 acres is really intended to be an area that <br />you would need to provide all of the functions if, you know, as requested, you know, like <br />quarry material doing your crushing, doing your concrete batching plant and doing your <br />asphalt treating area. But the so-called the whole in my mind would not, you know, <br />approximate like 12 acres but the area that youre going to utilize possibly would be <br />around that in size. It certainly would not be the size of the quarry that, the quarry pit <br />you see right now here in Hilo in the industrial area. <br />I would like to kind of suggest, you know, as added mitigation -. I know that the doctor <br />mentionedsomethingaboutliketheasphaltplantandthenthatmaybe,mayhavesome <br />carcinogenic relationship. Well, Im not a doctor, I dont profess to even have some <br />elementary knowledge of medicine or toxicology. But if the asphalt plant is of concern, <br />the Applicant is willing to delete that portion, you know, from the scope of the <br />application. <br />I note also that the Land Use Commission when it approved the permit and then <br />subsequently granted amendments, the Commission, the Land Use Commission did <br />require an additional condition and Id like to read this. It reads that, If it is determined <br />that adverse effects such as noise, dust or indiscriminate excavation is taking place, the <br />Planning Commission shall have the authority to require the Applicant to cease and desist <br />the quarry operation. If that is the kind of condition that the Commission would wish to <br />have as an added condition to further address the kind of potential concerns that the <br />public may, you know, may have raised, the public has raised, the Applicant would have <br />no objections to such a condition. <br />I think thats pretty much all. I mean, if there are other questions -. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, could you repeat for me what you were willing to <br />withdraw? <br />FUKE:The asphalt batching plant. The crushing operation and the <br />concrete batching plant are very essential components of the project and, of course, they <br />are related to the quarry. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Director, can you respond for our benefit to Mr. <br />Fukes willingness to add that condition and withdraw the asphalt batching? <br />YUEN:Well, I have no problem with the condition on adverse impact. <br />The asphalt batching is not something that the Department is asking be withdrawn. What <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.