My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:00:07 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:59:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK:Yes, I believe thatÓs Klana Huli HonuaÓs Exhibit 9. Is that <br />correct? <br />GIFFIN:Yes. <br />VITOUSEK:Now, it appears that there are several parcels on the mauka side of <br />Alii Drive there that up, theyÓre Land Commission award numbers. IsnÓt that correct? <br />And thatÓs usually indicative that those were kuleana which were awarded to a native <br />tenant during the Mahele and to the Land Commission process, isnÓt that correct? <br />KANAHELE:Yes. <br />VITOUSEK:And so how would you interpret the presence of so many kuleana <br />in the, along the road there in that ahupuaÒa in light of what you were saying about the <br />fact that the complex is all one complex and -? <br />KANAHELE:Well, the time of the kuleana is the time that weÓve already been <br />inundated by other cultures and other values. And so they went in to satisfy that <br />particular time; and the other cultures, they went into the idea of dividing the land. ItÓs, a <br />different time, different group of people do not take away from sacredness of that land. <br />And the kuleanas also went to aliis of, that was, resided on that land; also, aliis that had <br />some kind of kuleana for that land, or in association with the land. <br />VITOUSEK:But does it suggest that at least at the time of the Mahele and the <br />subsequent Land Commission that individual native Hawaiians felt they owned separate <br />or, you know, felt they were entitled to separate defined parcels in that area? <br />KANAHELE:I donÓt think they thought that they were entitled to it. I think that <br />the land was afforded them because they lived there for awhile. <br />coming down as far as the law is concerned that the land be divided; and so it was <br />divided according to who was there. And a lot of times in the Mahele, they didnÓt feel <br />like they were entitled to the land. They were just going along with what was there with <br />the alii; and a lot of them gave their land back because they didnÓt know what to do with <br />the land. So as far as entitlement is concerned, at that point of the Mahele, there was no <br />idea of entitlement. <br />VITOUSEK:I may have mis-spoke. I didnÓt intend to impute more to <br />entitlement than I meant. All I was trying to get at was that there were individual land <br />claims which were made and found valid in the Land Commission pr <br />resulted in -. <br />KANAHELE:It was found valid according to -. <br />VITOUSEK:The Land Commission? <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.