My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (4)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:00:34 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:00:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
focused on the Blasman property. ItÓs focused on the Keakealaniwahine parcel. But in, <br />and thatÓs the last that I know of it. <br />Now we could do, what you have to do is a title search and find out at some point <br />somebody sold or otherwise granted out an acre and a quarter. Now the <br />Keakealaniwahine parcel of about 16 acres, the configuration of that changed over time. <br />I looked that up, and I just, I canÓt remember that off the top of my head. But it was in <br />the last few years. I think that, there were two TMKs. The larger part of 7-2-2-8, you <br />know, at some point, 7-2-2-8 went, went way up mauka. And, at some point, <br />subdivisions were made makai of Kuakini Highway. <br />GIFFIN:Right. <br />YUEN:Then at some point, what we now call the Keakealaniwahine parcel which <br />is Parcel 11, there was a split of a lower part of this grant. But the parcel is not in this <br />configuration. The configuration was changed in the early 1990Ós to the present <br />configuration of Lot 11. <br />GIFFIN:So is that when those subdivisions mauka of the subject property and the <br />heiau were developed? Because I donÓt recall when those subdivisions came before the <br />department, although I was not on the Commission at that time, that there was any kind <br />of public testimony similar to what weÓre hearing over this application? Am I mistaken? <br />YUEN:That I, you mean the subdivision thatÓs shown, and I donÓt <br />of it, in Grant 7-2-2-8, makai of Kuakini? <br />GIFFIN:Yeah. <br />YUEN:I know nothing about that. I canÓt help you with that at al <br />GIFFIN:Okay. Well, I was just astounded that here we are looking at a map that <br />shows these existing subdivisions; and I think in public testimony Mr. Roy even talked <br />about finding historic sites and/or features that were not even recognized by the State or <br />the County. And I think that he spoke about a heiau that was being, I donÓt know, sold or <br />auctioned because of tax delinquency. And I found that astoundi <br />I also, Mr. Yuen, go back to this report that Maile David included as her Exhibit A which <br />was, itÓs a report by the advisory committee, the cultural resource management report that <br />Mr. Roy was the chairman of. And in the back of it, there is a <br />statement by the chairman. Where, and I read with interest, he speaks of how this <br />property was, you know, sold and subdivided, not subdivided, but divided. Did your <br />research coincide with what is stated in his report, or his statement in Ms. DavidÓs <br />Exhibit A? <br />YUEN:Could I look at that? Could I look at that? <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.