2006-08-25 D-BAR - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

condition numbered at, let’s see what was the number here, that they can’t -. Here, it’s Condition No. 5, “An access and circulation plan providing for interconnection,” and then it says, it goes on to say, “No access to the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway shall be permitted unless approved….” I would suggest that you be more proactive and you say that, a one-way emergency access road, “A one-way road for emergency access only to the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway shall be permitted” and that it be, “and it have a lock on it for emergency personnel only.” And this is done quite often; and it is feasible, it is possible. But to depend on going through the Kingman property is a problem ‘cause you’ll be crossing two historic trails, one on this property and one on the Kingman property, and the burials. A number of burials are very prolific. And I realize you don’t know that, but they are. I’ve been working on this for over 15 years so I know exactly what I’m talking about here. Additionally, and I thank you for the leeway, Mr. Chairman, to make these comments. I hope they’re very pertinent. I had concerns about the cultural resources in the Parkway right-of-way; and Mr. Dickler has told me that title has already passed to the County. I don’t know if that’s, I assume that’s true. If it has then that’s the reason that none of those resources was covered in the Archaeological Inventory Survey. If it isn’t, then there may be other items -. And I also found out that this SMA application does not include properties above the Great Wall of Kuakini. That’s a separate parcel. It would be handled on another matter so I won’t -. And I did bring this up last time I was before you, so we won’t be discussing that. So the next condition would be to restrict any grading changes, elevation changes so they’re minimal. We don’t need these 50-foot cuts and 50-foot fills. Mr. Dickler has told me that there aren’t going to be those kind of major cuts and fills. But I would hope that you’d put it in as a condition because it just lends itself to more runoff. And two more, and that is add a condition, to which you’ve already spoken about and which I agree with, to augment and provide public parking at the makai end where the flood, the AE area is. It’s very important. And to work with, and to combine it, to do it in concert with the County land which is where the pump station, sewage pump station is. This should have been done many years ago and has not been done. There’s plenty of space there for a lot more than, you know, ten parking places. And we really need the parking there because the on-street parking is very dangerous. It’s just a matter of time before somebody gets killed down there, with people coming in and out of cars. And it’s every day it’s congested down there, not just Saturdays and Sundays. And lastly here, that the, any claims for traditional and customary practice which are constitutionally protected will be honored. And I hope that they do this, they find this out before they build, design and build their project. Because if they build it and then they find out, they’re not going to be able to redesign it, obviously. And so that’s the reason one needs to do these things upfront. And, let’s see, did I request a copy of the Parkway Access Management Plan? Mr. Chairman, did I already ask you that? ALAMEDA:Yes, you did. EXHIBIT B 25