Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioners Rosam, Ward, and Plunkett agreed to approve the <br />application with special provisions to work with Finance through line items. They <br />urged the commission not to defer because the work is being done on the <br />property, and last year's postponement was never put back on the agenda. <br />Corporation Counsel Ms. Campbell suggested deferring it and suggested <br />the commission assist the applicant in filling out the application because a pre - <br />review of the application had been offered earlier. <br />Commissioner Plunkett expressed concerns about the fairness of special <br />treatment of this applicant. A project coordinator could be contracted to write <br />these proposals. The commission expressed concerns that a management plan <br />is needed to address the points made in the application and by the applicant. Dir. <br />Kon supported the help, is willing to redo the application for the November <br />meeting, and is willing to accept the commission's decision. <br />As a result of this discussion, Chr. Chang withdrew her motion and continued to <br />a new motion. <br />MOTION: Chr. Chang moved that this application be deferred and assigned two <br />commissioners to work with Dir. Kon will revise the grant application for the <br />November 13, 2023, meeting with the possibility of deferring it to the January <br />2024 meeting, if necessary. V.Chr. Kelepolo seconded the motion, and a <br />discussion ensued. <br />Commissioner Plunkett asked if language in the Rules allows them to assist and if <br />this action is deemed unfair to other applicants. Ms. Campbell reminded the <br />commission that they offered to assist any applicant with the pre -review of their <br />applications and, in the future, the plan is to continue to assist grant applicants. <br />Commissioners Crivello and Rosam volunteered to work with Dir. Kon. <br />There being no further discussions, Chr. Chang called for a roll -call vote. <br />Commissioners Ward, Plunkett, Rosam, Kelepolo, Crivello, and Chr. Chang all <br />verbally voted "Aye." With 6-Ayes, 2-Excused Absences, and 1-Vacancy, the <br />motion passed unanimously. <br />Chr. Chang called for a break and reconvened at 2:42 p.m. There being no public testimony, <br />Chr. Chang moved to Old Business. <br />III. OLD BUSINESS: <br />1. Report from the PInG for 2024 Suggestion Form. <br />2. Report from the PInG for Criteria Assessment Form. <br />Chr. Chang reminded the commission that there are no discussions permitted on these <br />agenda items, but they will be discussed in the November meeting. Due to the time, she <br />asked if it was okay to give no verbal reports and encouraged the commission to read the <br />Minutes of September 11, 2023, Approved <br />Page 15 <br />