Laserfiche WebLink
water system improvement, however, fire hydrants to each and every one of the lots would be <br />available within that subdivision. <br />Secondly, where would the waterline be in? The waterline would not be within the road. <br />There€s a 20-foot wide pavement in that area. So the waterlines, like all waterline <br />improvements, are within the right-of-way. That€s outside of the pavement area; and that€s <br />where the waterline is planned to be made. Prior to its installation, however, it becomes <br />incumbent upon this developer or in conjunction with any other developer in that area, they <br />would have to submit construction plans to the Water Department for their review and approval; <br />and then they€ve got to approve it. And unless they approve it, Mr. Yuen will not approve the <br />subdivision. <br />Relative to the roadway, and I think that, you know, there has been a lot of confusion as far as <br />like whose obligation was it, so on and so forth. And, you know, quite honestly I don€t have all <br />ofthefactualhistorybehindit.ButjusttryingtopiecetogetherwhatinformationthatIhave <br />based upon my knowledge of the Plant Mason subdivision, I mean, Plant Mason€s property and <br />my discussions with Mr. Tallett and hearing today€s discussion -. And I think the best way to do <br />it is like if you can look at this map, you know, on this map over here, it will kind of like give <br />you some idea as far as like, you know, where this RS-15 area is. And from what I understand, <br />when the property was initially rezoned, it was rezoned, you know, back in 1996, it included this <br />1.372 acre area; and that was how the roadway was going to be realigned. And then in 1997 <br />when the subdivision was approved, the subdivision created this existing line, I mean, you know, <br />the way that you see right now. And whether the subdivider then, you know, which was C. <br />Brewer or whatever the current name is, you know, had intended to realign that road to make it <br />consistent with, you know, how you see that crescent shape area, you know, I€m not really sure. <br />But the fact of the matter remains today is that it can€t really be implemented because, you know, <br />all of these property owners in the realignment section has, you know, the properties are all <br />owned, you know, are all sold already. I mean if C. Brewer then, you know, continues to own all <br />of these properties then possibly it would be possible to, you know, have this road realigned. <br />But, you know, that€s kind of like water under the bridge. <br />Who owns this roadway? The roadway right now is not owned by all of these property owners. <br />They all have easement rights or access rights over it. It€s owned by Mauna Kea Sugar Property. <br />And if, you know, there was a question as far as like well who, you know, I think Commissioner <br />Salavea asked the questioned like, well, what€s the possible alternative. I mean like if I were in <br />that kind of position, I would want to say that, well, there were a number of lots coming in this <br />area, you have people who are using the property residentially, you have people using it <br />agriculturally, you have some people that are using it for industrial uses, I mean, like, we€ll, <br />we€ve all got to get together. We€ve all got to ask C. Brewer to have the land conveyed to the <br />association and the association now it becomes incumbent upon you to maintain that road. <br />Because, you know, C. Brewer owns that road right now. <br />But say if there€s like a major problem to that roadway, there€s disrepair, I mean, you know, at <br />some point in time it€s going to fall into disrepair, whose obligation is it to repair it? I don€t think <br />you€re going to find C. Brewer or Mauna Kea Sugar to say I€m going to fix the road. I think the <br />best way to do it, you€ve got to convey the roadway, that sliver of land has got to be conveyed to <br />the association, and you have some sort of a maintenance agreement and everybody pay your pro <br />rata share. <br />24EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />