2005-12-08 TLava Kuakini - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WATANABE:60 foot. YUEN:It would be quite a differentstandard than what they have in mind. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA: Yes I wanted to backtrack just a minute to condition C since were moving on here. I want to say that having seen a lot of cases where were presented with a partial plan for a property and then we dont know what the full you know thing is going to be down the line. And Ive commented on this before about my dissatisfaction with having to make decisions based on-. Parker School was one of those, yeah where we had a big lot and were only talking about developing part of it. And I felt very uncomfortable with that. And so I want to thank you for even though youre planning to develop in phases about giving us the full picture ahead of time that really helps a lot. So I want to thank you for that. And, say that with that understandingIpersonallyhavenoproblemwithextendingthe3yearsto5toallowforthat.So I just wanted to get that. You know since were moving along from number to number here. Before we get too far towards the end of the alphabet to make that point. ALAMEDA:Okay. With that note. Commissioners any, any, if you had to backtrack on some of those proposed changes in the conditions, feedback? Okay, Mr. Lim continue. LIM:Okay Ill go through and really quickly here. A lot of these are just technical changes I think. Going onto condition number N. At the end of the sentence we would like the improvements, drainage improvements to be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. Theyre asking that the drainage improvements be constructed prior to issuance of any construction permit. So, I think just common sense wise we should change it to CO. On the condition O, the next one. The third sentence in there states, no residential lots may be created which lack a buildable area. This restriction may be removed by amendment of this ordinance by the County Council. Ive talked to the Director about this I think he doesnt agree but in my mind that, I dont know what exactly that means because its basically a statement of the law. The residential lots have to, have to meet a certain buildable area under the zoning code but you know its up to him as to what he wants to do on that. The next sentence states that a copy of the proposed covenants to be recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. Id like to propose adding or Final Plan Approval, as applicable. Final Subdivision Approval is usually for lots. Final Plan Approval is usually for a condominium development like this. Going down to condition P on the next page, on the fifth line. Basically were trying to establish compliance by the issuance of the Certificate of ththth occupancy on both the 5 line and 10 line. And on the 9 line which says that the improvements, it states a list of improvements. I think we should say that the hazard barrier fencing,andshallbecompletedpriortotheissuanceofanyCertificateofoccupancy.That would give us a very consistent deadline for completing everything. ALAMEDA:Director? EXHIBIT B 17