My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD BACKGROUND REPORT
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-06-06 Windward
>
Item #8 Ryan & Paul Pastorek (PL-SMA-2024-000055)
>
PD BACKGROUND REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2024 10:06:21 AM
Creation date
5/30/2024 9:49:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
PD BACKGROUND REPORT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
449
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
associated with developing these coastal parcels. The study concluded that there is an <br /> Average Annual Erosion Rate (AAER) of 0.36-feet/year along the shoreline of the <br /> project area. <br /> 19. Flora/Fauna Resources: Both properties have been surveyed for rare, threatened, and <br /> endangered flora and fauna; the report found none in the project area. However, as is <br /> typical, the Hawaiian hawk, and the Hawaiian hoary bat are assumed to occasionally use <br /> portions of the site (tree stand area). This area has been historically utilized for <br /> commercial agriculture, ranching, what has altered the vegetation throughout this area. <br /> The primary vegetation is pasture grasses, common ironwood, and coconut, along with <br /> other non-native trees and shrubs. During the biotic survey, several common birds were <br /> observed, including common myna, cardinal, doves, and finches. It is unlikely that any <br /> native or endangered forest birds would utilize these properties due to the lack of native <br /> forest, invasive species, and geography of the site. <br /> 20. Archaeological Resources: The applicants conducted an Archaeological Inventory <br /> Survey (AIS) of the project area as part of the environmental assessment process. Two <br /> (2) rock walls were identified as significant under criterion "D", however, the AIS found <br /> that these sites would not be adversely impacted by the proposed project and no further <br /> action was required. <br /> 21. Cultural/Historic Resources: As part of the environmental assessment prosses, the <br /> applicants conducted a Cultural Impact Assessment(CIA) on the impacts of the proposed <br /> project on nearby cultural and historic resources. Based on the results of consultation <br /> regarding area land-use and cultural practices, no past or ongoing cultural practices were <br /> identified for the project area or requested by lineal descendants. There were cultural <br /> practices, namely fishing and gathering of ocean and plant resources, associated with the <br /> wider region of the project area. While the coastal portion of the property is a cliff with <br /> no safe access, the applicants will allow ocean gathering to be conducted. <br /> 22. Scenic and Open Space Resources: The construction of a new single-family dwelling <br /> on each subject parcel is anticipated to have minimal impacts on scenic views. The <br /> consolidation and resubdivision is being requested to minimize impacts associated with <br /> scenic views, noise, and air quality. Additionally, the proposed landscape plan will lessen <br /> -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.