My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-05-03 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-05-03 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2024 3:06:39 PM
Creation date
7/16/2024 3:05:13 PM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />May 3, 2024 <br />A "continuous recruitment" means that the recruitment just stays open, so that more applications <br />can be submitted, and received, and screened for the position. When a recruitment is on <br />continuous, as qualified applicants are identified, their names are immediately referred to the <br />department for action. <br />So, once the applicants—or the applications are screened by our Recruitment and Examination <br />DivisionHR's ability to, kind of, control what happens with that list—is out of our hands. <br />That becomes something that the department needs to move on. <br />MR. WISEMAN: I see. <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: But we'll continue to refer names as we receive qualified applicants until the <br />position is filled or until we've referred a sufficient pool and the department needs to take action. <br />So, it can be that on some continuous recruitments, we may be referring a couple of names a <br />month. The department may be interviewing, for whatever reason, not making a selection. So, <br />the recruitment would stay on continuous. But we are evaluating continuous recruitments <br />because if there've been multiple, eligible applicants referred—and the department hasn't taken <br />any action—we're going to close that continuous recruitment so that the department will take <br />action with the list of applicants that they have. <br />MR. WISEMAN: Thank you. It sounds complicated but I have an understanding now. So, <br />thank you. <br />MS. BOND: It just seems to me to be unfair to the people who apply at the beginning that now <br />two, three, four, five, six months down the road—they still don't—there's no judgement made. <br />Are they immediately told, after they've been referred, that, "No, you're no good" or "We don't <br />want you"—or do they have to sit and wait for eight months to find out that they don't get this <br />job. <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: So, again, the part that I can adjust is the part that happens in Human <br />Resources. So, when we receive the application, it's screened—our application screening is <br />occurring within 30 days because we're fully staffed. <br />And so, we're able to screen the applications quickly. Once the application is screened, the <br />applicant receives a letter either confirming that they met the qualifications and their name is <br />being forwarded to the department—or if there's some issue where they don't qualify for the <br />position, they're provided that feedback as far as what is needed or what is lacking in <br />documentation on the application to help us to certify their qualifications. And then, they can <br />follow-up with us to provide more information. <br />After the list is sent to the department, we always encourage our departments to act on the list as <br />soon as possible by scheduling interviews. No notification from the department should come <br />that an applicant—they're not interested in an applicant unless the interview has occurred— <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.