2024-09-24 Salary Commission Minutes

Home

Salary Commission September 24, 2024 managerial supervisory position and an equivalent department in some kind of private sector, where they manage the same amount of employees and they do the same kind of duties but maybe just not the same exact—climate/equity. But I see the point of that, too, because it is important to state that it might—you might be able to find a job that pays more, so if someone who's reading it says, "Well, these kinds of jobs get this much and I supervise that many employees, so how come this job doesn't?" I see why it was put in there. But I don't have a problem removing it. I was just saying I see why it was put there. MS. GREENBAUM: Commissioner Greenbaum. I do agree. I think it's more being—it's being more transparent than anything. And you're covering as much basis as you possibly can, so that the public is aware that we're making decisions that are informed, and I think it'll be better received in trying to get this passed or not having disputed by the public. MS. FRENZ: This is DCC Cody. I'd also add that part of my rationale is this, is what we you all talked about last time. But, in addition, I believe Commissioner Nelson, I think, brought in some outside information on what other jurisdictions doing something similar. So, there was information shared with this body to look at what outside entities of similar related situations maybe not directly on -point with our version of OSCERbut what other jurisdictions that have similar duties do, in fact, pay. And so, because that information was considered by this body, that's why I kept it there—also, in-line with what we did last time. So, that's part of that rationale. So, it did cover—and the intent was to make sure that I helped you cover as many basis as possible for if and when there shall be questioning and/or clarity sought by the public or anyone as to how this body got to where it is today. But I, again, I can delete it as well. Whateverwhether, if theso, I guess, at this point, we have a motion on the table to delete those and we'll see if that carries. CHR. PAVAO: Yeah. I guess, it'd probably, the first thing we need to do is we vote. Any further discussion? If not, we'll go ahead and vote by signifying by saying aye, if you're in favor of the motion to delete that section? MR. NELSON: No, just the first sentence. CHR. PAVAO: Just the first sentence—and modify the second sentence, then yeah. Okay? Signify by saying aye or nay? MS. FRENZ: Let's do a rollcall. CHR. PAVAO: Okay. Page 6