Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Session Minutes <br />September 19,2025 <br />Page 9 <br />Chair Robinson stated that Ms. Correa will email the commission a copy ofthe <br />interrogatory used in the previous selection process. He explained that the commission <br />could either form a PIG or allow the full commission to review and provide collective <br />feedback. The commission agreed to review the emailed interrogatory. <br />Chair Robinson confirmed that Commissioner Botelho will work with HR. DCC Salas- <br />Ferguson clarified that outside of a meeting, two commissioners may discuss the <br />interrogatory, but cannot reach an agreement or share it with a third commissioner. <br />Commissioners may also contact him for legal guidance. It was noted that the secretary <br />should coordinate with HR to ensure continuity, with all administrative correspondence <br />running through the secretary’s office. <br />Chair Robinson asked if further discussion was needed regarding the formation of a PIG. <br />Vice Chair Bertsch recommended deferring that discussion until the next meeting and <br />revisiting it if necessary. There was no further discussion. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Correspondence No. 25-o the appointing <br />authorities concerning proposed salary adjustments. <br />Chair Robinson asked if the commissionwished to respond to the Salary Commission. He <br />stated that if there were no objections, he wouldcontinue the interaction with the <br />commission on their behalf. <br />Commissioner Tavares noted that the Salary Commission’s memo appeared to base <br />proposed adjustments on mirroring HGEA executive salaries. He expressed that this <br />oversimplifies the issue and suggested a more thorough analysis, including considerations <br />for inflation, cost-of-living adjustments, and other factors. He recommended that the Salary <br />-specific review <br />rather than relying solely on another agency’s model. <br />Chair Robinson agreed, acknowledging that while the Salary Commission is being <br />proactive, it is important to ensure adherence to governmental standards. He stated he <br />would incorporate these points in his response. <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION(CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC) <br />CommissionerTavaresmotioned to meet inexecutive session to consider <br />charges against officers or employees of the police department, where matters affecting <br />privacy will be involved, to consider sensitive matters related to public safety, and may <br />consult with the board’s attorney on questions and issues pertaining to the commission’s <br />powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and liabilities pursuant to HRS §92-5 (a)(2)(4)(6) <br />and-20 (b). Seconded by Vice Chair Bertsch, with <br />no discussion,the motionpassedunanimously. Executive session convened at 11:53a.m. <br /> <br />