Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Merit Appeals Board July 18, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Right. <br /> <br />MR. DISHER: —case—the petition. Whereas, if you’re doing something in executive session, <br />that is outside of what would be known to the public. So— <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Then you would need a motion. <br /> <br />MR. DISHER: I would say so. Yeah. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: But not if it’s a closed session? <br /> <br />MR. DISHER: Right. Because it’s—you’re still—there still would be, like, a record—say, <br />there’s a secondary appeal from MAB to Circuit Court—there’s still a record of those <br />proceedings that would be provided and available. So. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Oh, okay. Thank you. Thank you, all. <br /> <br />9:00 A.M. HEARING: COMMUNICATION NOS. 24-13 And 25-03 (And Related <br />Communications). Note: The Hearing Concerns The Preliminary Issue Or Any Other <br />Preliminary Issue Of Whether The Board Has Jurisdiction To Hear The Appeal, Under <br />Section 76-14, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes. If It Is Determined That The Board Has <br />Jurisdiction, An Additional Hearing Will Be Scheduled Concerning The Merits Of The <br />Appeal. <br /> <br />Communication No. 24-13, Received On July 25, 2024, From Appellant, Appealing The <br />Following Action By The County Of Hawaiʻi’s Office Of The Mayor: An Employment <br />Action Taken Under Chapter 76, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes; And <br />Communication No. 24-13.01, Received On August 29, 2024, From Appellant, Transmitting <br />Documents Entitled “Representation And Correspondence.” The Appellant Requests The <br />Following: 1) The Hearing Be Delayed Until The Appellant Can Obtain Proper Legal <br />Counsel; And 2) Merit Appeals Board Chair, Gabriella Cabanas, Be Recused From <br />Making Any Decisions Involving Appellants Appeal; And <br />Communication No. 24-13.02, Received On August 29, 2024, From Mark D. Disher, Deputy <br />Corporation Counsel, On Behalf Of Appellee, Regarding Appellee’s Position Statement; <br />Exhibits “A” – “H”; And <br />Communication No. 25-03, Received On March 4, 2025, From Ted H. S. Hong, Esquire, Re <br />Notice Of Appearance Of Counsel For Appellant; And <br />Communication No. 25-03.01, Received On June 12, 2025, From Ted H. S. Hong, Esquire, <br />On Behalf Of Appellant, Regarding Appellant’s Statement On The Merit Appeals Board’s <br />Jurisdiction; And <br />Communication No. 25-03.02, Received On June 27, 2025, From Mark D. Disher, Deputy <br />Corporation Counsel, On Behalf Of Appellee, Regarding Appellees’ Response To <br />Appellant’s Statement On The Merit Appeals Board’s Jurisdiction; Exhibits “I” – “L”. <br />(Executive Session: The Merit Appeals Board Anticipates Convening One Or More <br />Executive Meetings Regarding The Above Matter, Pursuant To HRS Sections 92-4, <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />