My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-12-22 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-12-22 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 4:02:15 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 3:58:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission December 22, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: But just to provide a little bit of additional information, since the Chair has given <br />that grace. The—after this body did its draft proposed Findings, did the public notice, and the <br />public hearing—SHOPO arbitration concluded, and it was much higher. So, there is the <br />potential, yet again, and I—for inversion. <br /> <br />But I also wanted to clarify one other point that I think you’ve brought up, ‘cause there might be <br />a misunderstanding. The reference to the salary inversion table that you were talking about <br />earlier today, that’s base pay. So, what you need to remember is that for Police and Fire— <br /> <br />MS. OTSUKA: Right. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: —where there was the potential for possible inversion. Everybody that’s not a <br />chief or an assis—the deputy chief—we have our interim chief here today for Fire—they don’t <br />get overtime. So, everybody below—assistant chiefs and below—they all get overtime. <br /> <br />So, if you have an assistant chief, right—I think with the example with Police was like $100.00 <br />and somewhat dollars between the deputy chief and the next assistant chief—that’s base pay, but <br />the assistant chiefs are still able to bill overtime. So there will always be inversion because <br />they’re provided that opportunity, whereas the others cannot. So, I wanted to just clarify that, <br />since you referenced it. <br /> <br />MS. OTSUKA: Thank you. And— <br /> <br />CHR. PAVAO: Deputy (inaudible)—hazardous pay is something that we didn’t deal with <br />because the Charter doesn’t give us that power. But all the collective bargaining agen—the <br />Unions negotiated for hazardous pay during COVID. So, they all got hazardous pay—none of <br />the appointed and elected officials got hazardous pay. <br /> <br />MS. OTSUKA: Thank you. So, on the inversion, though, on the chart—on the report that was <br />provided last month—I understand it’s a snapshot and just for the month, and it changes every <br />month. But the total amount of the 33 positions, there were only two positions that were <br />affected, and it was $1,300.00 that month—only .06%. So, all I’m saying is the inversion—that <br />there is no, as far as I see—that there is no crisis. It’s a payroll dynamic sort of thing. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: So, again, that’s base pay. <br /> <br />MS. OTSUKA: Right. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: So, every—if everyone is allowed to also—with the exception of the top two—bill <br />overtime when they work overtime, which happens a lot, there will automatically always be— <br />there’s always going to be problems. <br /> <br />So, that was just showing you, again, base pay. So, I think that that’s a misunder— <br />misconception or the way you’re reviewing it is confusing because it may appear that there’s <br />Page 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.