2026 06 10_Appellant Ohana's Objections to Record, Rosehill Dec, and COS_v1.pdf

Home

On October 14, 2025, in addition to receiving a Stop Work Order for further unauthorized construction, the Applicant withdrew its SMA Use Permit application PL-SMA-2024-000063. About two weeks later, on October 27, the Applicant filed the SMA Minor Permit application, PL- SMM-2025-000079, at issue in this appeal. The October 3, 2024 hearing minutes establish the specific context in which that withdrawal occurred and are directly related to evaluating the Decision. C. The 2024 Planning Department Recommendation Report for PL-SMA-2024- 000063 The Planning Department's Recommendation Report recommending that the Windward Planning Commission approve SMA Use Permit Application PL-SMA-2024-000063 was a public record in the Planning Department's file related to the Decision, which is a part of and should be included in the Record on Appeal. It is, however, absent from the Record as filed. This report was issued by the Planning Department in September 2024 in advance of the October 3, 2024 hearing and reflects the Department's analysis of the 5-lot subdivision application, including its environmental, cultural, and SMA findings at the time it recommended approval. The report is directly relevant because it reflects the Department's prior assessment of this property and project. While the recommendation was ultimately reversed at the October 3, 2024 hearing, the Department's written analysis and findings for the larger project are part of the evidentiary and analytical background against which the Decision to approve the SMA Minor Permit must be evaluated. D. The Director's October 29, 2025 Reply to Leslie Enriquez Rosehill The Director's October 29, 2025 reply to Leslie Enriquez Rosehill was a record in the Planning Department's file related to the Decision; it is a part of and should be included in the Record on Appeal. Document 15 of the record is an email from Leslie Enriquez Rosehill to R