My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
budget so, the first category is the key under General Funds. That’s Real Property Tax. <br />And I think this is where you should focus because, although we can still cover other <br />areas but the General Fund is what our taxes pays for, Transient Accommodation <br />Taxes and so forth. If you want to know where we spend our money this would give you <br />a good idea of where the money goes. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So you’re saying that the items funded with the General Fund are <br />the ones that we should focus on because those are the ones that we could actually <br />maybe have some impact on? <br />MR.TAKABA: <br /> Yeah. We should look at everything, but the General Fund is where you <br />will fund with taxpayers money. Like Highway Fund has fuel tax so when you fill gas, <br />and that’s self sustaining. What you get with what you spend. That’s not really <br />something that will concern us as much as the General Fund. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It seems to me that we might want to just move right into agenda <br />item 7 because, how we identify the core county responsibilities and how we tackle our <br />task seem to be intimately related. We can’t really separate them. So, does anyone <br />have any objection if we move right into agenda item 7 to cut discussion regarding <br />approach to take? <br />MS. WONG <br />: No problem. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> While we’re going to do this, does anyone want to take a quick <br />break? Cause this could be a lengthy discussion. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Who has to leave early and what time do you have to leave? <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br /> I leave at 12. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br /> I leave at 12:15. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay. I hope someone, I have been sort of racking my brain about <br />the best way to tackle this. We certainly got a start by sending out our letter and getting <br />some feedback. But I’ve been trying to figure out a way to tackle this, and I haven’t <br />come up with anything other than the way we had done it in the past, which is go <br />through department by department. When we did it that way in the past, we were in <br />quite a different situation, financial situation for the county. I think we have an <br />opportunity to tackle things in a different way this time. But other than our suggestion to <br />look at core services, I haven’t been able to formulate a way that we could tackle it. So <br />I’m hoping that you all have some wonderful suggestions. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> As I was listening to Alex, that’s an area, you know like energy, it’s <br />almost like a subcategory of general expenditures and it cuts across all departments. <br />So I’m wondering if a team of two or three people just work on energy. People who are <br />interested in that area, just work on energy related matters and maybe somebody else <br />or another group work on, concentrate on other areas. It was just a thought as Alex <br />was giving his presentation that maybe some of us who might be really interested in <br />digging deeper into what they’re doing and working with them on and find out what <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.