Laserfiche WebLink
MS. O’HARA: <br />Review internal processes and determine ways to include... I don’t want to say <br />technology because it’s too broad. I’m sorry I started a sentence and didn’t finish it. <br />MS. NICOLSON: <br />Are we trying to get at saying something about doing as much of this <br />. <br />process online as possible rather than through paperwork <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />That’s what we’re trying to get to yes. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />Maybe streamlining the process through current technology. You <br />didn’t want to use technology but I think technology is still going to have to come in. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I just think it’s going to be too general for people to really understand what <br />we’re asking for. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />We could give examples such as electronic signatures or whatever you <br />call it, reducing paperwork through online… <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Distribution. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Distribution. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />A lot of things are still mailed and hard copy or carried by the mail clerk <br />department to department. Whereas if you distribute electronically it’s faster. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Do we have enough now that we can craft this into something readable? <br />MS. CARVALHO: <br />We should probably try and form a sentence on it. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Isn’t she diplomatic. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Eileen, do you have anything? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Incorporate technology including electronic signature, electronic distribution, <br />and what else did we say? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />This is a separate sentence. So it follows this one, so it’s such as the use <br />of electronic signatures, online approvals, electronic distribution. So we can use it as an <br />example. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes that should work. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay any other discussion on A1a. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Okay so with that change you’re moving A1a up into your draft. What would <br />you like it under? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well this is not, Eileen, necessarily just targeted to the contracting <br />division is it? Is it to all departments? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />No, it’s to all departments.This is an all department thing. <br />6 <br /> <br />