Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gilmartin feels that they need to look at the lists subjectively, and consider the properties that scored <br />high. <br />Mr. Flores noted that upon acquisition of properties, it will be removed from the list and properties that <br />are still in negotiations should still remain on the list. They should consider adding new properties that <br />have never been on the list. <br />Mr. Van Bergen reminded them that once Council issues a resolution for a property it's no longer in <br />their hands. Ms. Self stated that it's up to the County administration to decide which properties to <br />purchase and if there's matching funds available it helps in leveraging funds. <br />Mr. Flores suggested that "properties from previous prioritized lists should continue to be pursued as far <br />as possible unless: 1) property has been acquired by County; 2) owner not willing to sell; 3) in- sufficient <br />funds; 4) not able to obtain a County Council resolution." <br />Mr. Van Bergen recommended that they include the past prioritized lists in their annual report with a <br />status update for those properties. Mr. Gilmartin added that this should be included as an appendix in <br />the report. <br />Motion: Commissioner Gilmartin moved to amend the status report of all the previous activity, <br />prioritized lists, purchases, resolutions that summarizes all that from 2009 back, and that the new report <br />just has the items we want to add to the list with the language suggesting that we exhaust all means of <br />acquiring earlier properties before moving on to the ones that we're adding within the limitation of <br />funds. <br />Mr. Gilmartin re- stated his motion. <br />Motion: Commissioner Gilmartin moved to add an appendix with all the historical status of all <br />previous properties proposed put on the prioritized list and in the current report for 2010, just list <br />the properties we want to suggest for purchase after we've exhausted the purchase process of the <br />other properties. Seconded by Commissioner Hirakami; all members voted aye, motion carried. <br />Commissioners to discuss establishing a policy regarding properties that are not for <br />sale /acquisition <br />Mr. Gilmartin commented that he doesn't think a property should be put on the list if the owner <br />indicates that they are not willing to sell. He added that it's very misleading. <br />Mr. Flores agreed that they should not include it on the prioritized list; however include it in the <br />comprehensive list of all properties submitted. <br />Mr. Flores clarified that all suggestion forms will always be evaluated and assessed but if the property is <br />not for sale it will not be considered for the prioritized list. <br />7- <br />