My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-ES Executive Summary - Limited Scope Performance Audit Parks and Recreation Facilities Asset Management
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2011-01-ES Executive Summary - Limited Scope Performance Audit Parks and Recreation Facilities Asset Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2011 9:54:40 AM
Creation date
7/22/2011 9:54:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P&R Does Not Have Reliable Estimates of Building Replacement Values <br />Recommendation 3.3: <br />P&R should calculate the current costs to replace each building <br />record this data in its facilities inventory. <br />P&R Does Not Have Accurate Cost Estimates for Deferred Maintenance Backlog <br />Recommendation 3.4: <br />P&R should calculate current cost estimates to return each facil <br />“safe, clean, enjoyable, accessible and aesthetically pleasing” condition that is one of its <br />strategic goals for facilities. A condition assessment and cost analysis for repairs, hazardous <br />materials abatement, and ADA improvements should be completed for each facility in order to <br />evaluate whether it would be more cost-effective to rehabilitate <br /> <br /> <br />FINDING FOUR:P&R OPERATIONAL PROCESSES FOR FACILITIES MAINTENANCE <br /> <br />AND REPAIRS ARE INSUFFICIENT <br />Inventory of Facilities is Missing Key Components <br />Recommendation 4.1: <br /> P&R should develop a complete facilities inventory that include <br />essential inventory information recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association <br />(GFOA) and National Research Council (NRC), and sufficient detail to assess current condition <br />of facilities and their major components. <br /> <br />Insufficient Periodic Maintenance and Repair Operations <br />Recommendation 4.2: <br />The Parks Maintenance Division should develop a list and schedul <br />critical maintenance and repair activities. All maintenance and <br />tracked to completion in the Maintenance Work Request System maintained by the Division. <br />The County Administration should also evaluate the possibility o <br />Maintenance Division manpower and equipment with any capacity fr <br />clarify any resource-sharing responsibilities of the departments in written policies and <br />procedures. <br />Insufficient Recognition of the Impact of Deferring Maintenance and Repair <br />is a Root Cause of Deteriorating Facilities <br />Recommendation 4.3: <br />The County Administration and Council could facilitate the succe <br />P&RÓs asset management efforts by setting a “Tone at the Top” establishing the highest priority <br />for performance of and accountability for maintenance of existin <br />infrastructure by: <br /> Establishing and communicating the priority for maintaining exi <br /> Requiring the development of CIP and Operating Budgets funded w <br />revenues to be based on long-term plans that recognize the prior <br />preventative maintenance and major rehabilitation or replacement <br /> <br /> Requiring that all proposed CIP project data sheets (Financial Impact Statements) include the <br />analysis and disclosure of: <br /> Ongoing maintenance costs, including full-time employee (FTE) r <br />o <br /> Life cycle cost estimates and plans to reduce life cycle costs <br />o <br />materials and construction methods. <br /> <br /> Requiring the establishment of and reporting on relevant and qu <br />measures for long-term asset and infrastructure maintenance. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.