Laserfiche WebLink
Condition No. 2, as well as a new Condition No. 13, and renumbering all the other conditions. The <br />main reason for these added conditions has been through correspondence from an adjoining <br />neighbor with the applicant, as well as with the Department of Education, and the applicant having <br />some discussion as well. But mainly the concern is for Condition No. 2 is that the applicant be able <br />to construct the project in substantial compliance with the representation that they’ve made in the <br />application, and mainly I think the concern was access that it be in the location that they are <br />proposing rather than it be in another location. Additionally, there was a concern regarding possible <br />events that may have some negative impact to the surrounding properties, and so they wanted a <br />condition added that would allow an opportunity, in case there were some situations or maybe there <br />were events that got too noisy or something, that they have an avenue that that can be addressed – <br />so that would be our Condition No. 13. Additionally, looking at current Condition No. 8 on both <br />permits – just for your information, both permits contain the same conditions, so these would apply <br />to both permits – Condition No. 8, which I’m sure will be renumbered to No. 9, states, “Driveway <br />connections to Onouli Road including the provision of adequate sight distances, shall meet with the <br />approval of the Department of Public Works and/or the Department of Transportation.” It was our <br />understanding that Onouli Road was State-owned; therefore, we were under the impression that it <br />was monitored through the Department of Transportation. We’ve learned that it’s actually owned <br />by the Department of Land and Natural Resources. And so what we’d like to do is change the <br />Department of Transportation to the Department of Land and Natural Resources – that would be on <br />both permits. Additionally, we’ve received correspondence from the Department of Education, as <br />well as from Mr. Ken Melrose, which both correspondences have been passed out to the Planning <br />Commission. With that, that concludes the presentation. Are there any questions? <br /> <br />MASUNAGA: Do you have an extra copy of the DOE letter? <br /> <br />DARROW: Sure. Do all the other Commissioners have all the correspondence that we have noted? <br />If anyone needs one, just let us know, and we can provide that. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you. Could the applicant and representative please come forward? Thank you. <br />If you could each raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now <br />before the Hawai‘i Leeward Planning Commission? <br /> <br />APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVES: I do. Yes. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you. If you could please introduce yourself, state your name, resident address, <br />and proceed after that. If we could start from your right. <br /> <br />PHARIS: My name is Jon Pharis. I’m the architect representing for the Church. My address is <br />2104 Hoohai Street, Pearl City, Hawai‘i. Last name spelling is P-H-A-R-I-S. First name is without <br />an H, J-O-N. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you. <br /> <br />SNIDER: My name is Rocky Snider, S-N-I-D-E-R. I’m the Church project manager and <br />authorized agent of the LDS Church based in Southern California. Do you need the residential <br />address? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: That’ll be fine. <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />