MIN RDC 2011-07-28.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

this, and we can report back to you at the next meeting, and see if there is some way to do this with general support type of questions. The scope of the contract that they called for, calls for the Esri consultant to work with direction from the CountyÓs technical staff and management, not with the public. There might be a real different base of fee or personnel for that kind of thing too, so perhaps we can do that and have a telephone conference with Esri. MR. MIDDLESWORTH : See if they can do a metering on it. MR. UDOVIC: I would be glad to work with Ms. Nakamoto to do this. CHR. SIRACUSA : Thank you. So, IÓm going to ask Karen to make a note of that be agendized for the next meeting. Do we have any more discussion on this topic? MR. MELROSE: I like the direction of this. I think it is important for us to make a commitment out of our effort to help the community understand how to use the software and to support it and us, I hope. I think that if Esri knew what that specifically was, they would write a different proposal. I like Valerie's specific question the kinds of questions and I would imagine that there would be a Ðnot to exceedÑ that we could come to. If the community is really struggling with it and it takes a lot of time, that is just the name of the game, we have got to keep helping the public to do it. IÓm all for spending money if it is for that purpose. So if you will bring back a better proposal next time; I mean a different proposal. LetÓs put that on the agenda next time. MR. UDOVIC : We can look at the scope of the work. MR. MELROSE: Yes, exactly, but be clear that the purpose is to provide the public, the County, and the Commissioners a recourse if you run into problems, and thatÓs all. CHR. SIRACUSA: Do we have any more discussion on this topic? Okay, we had a motion on the floor to close file, so IÓll take the vote now. The motion to close file on COMM. 23 regarding Esri quote for consulting service was carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Carvalho, Kahawaiolaa, Kahui, Kanuha, Melrose, Middlesworth, Poindexter, Ugalde, and Chair Siracusa. Noes: None. Absent: None. CHR. SIRACUSA: Now we will go back to Communication 22, which we postponed. they are not done yet, so they are still working on it. WeÓll move along to Communication 24. 17