MIN RDC 2011-07-28.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

consider them as they come in, up until the deadline? These are the alternate plans. Do we wait until after the deadline, when all the plans are in, and then we look at them on that particular agenda? ThatÓs another question. And then, we did talk about a way to view them here. We could project it so that you guys could see an enlarged version. We could zoom in on areas to discuss the maps. So, once they are submitted electronically, I think we would go online and look at those maps, or we could get them on a jump drive and we could project them. I guess we can cross that road when we come to it, but I what I needed to hear in the discussion was; how do the maps end up coming to me, and then would I be giving them a new number so that they could remain anonymous and we would look at them as map number 1 through whatever, or A,B,C, whatever we decide to call them, and present them as agen CHR. SIRACUSA : I should think we would want to give them numbers to avoid co keep track of them, and especially take them in order. Then we could agendize. IÓm wondering if we would need a separate section on the agenda for review of MS. EOFF : Yes, and then that could come up at several meetings, if necessary, until we are hitting the deadline and then we are done reviewing maps and we would have either rejected those that are not meeting the criteria or for whatever reason we would officially reject them, and we would be left with a set of maps that then become part of our public hearing discussion maps, that we take with us and continue to discuss. MR. MELROSE : My suggestion is that these are submitted to the Office of Elections. That is the appropriate place to send them. The Elections Office needs to know what they are going to get when somebody hits Ðsubmit.Ñ That is between you and Esri, so that they can be clear about what that is going to be. I think a lot of the questions that you ask in that format; some of those are already addressed in the analysis that is attached to that submitted map. So my assumption is that when you submit, you are going to get that specific body of analysis that will be part of the file that gets dropped to the County. It is not just a map, it is that evaluation. You should use that evaluation to the extent possible and then you can ask some additional questions about some of the other County considerations. But, the point is to understand what is going to come to you electronically; that is the only form you are going to take a map is electronically. So that is one. Two, is what gets delivered by the software, and what additional questions you need to ask of them. MS. EOFF: Then when someone hits submit, would it be the State that directs it to Office of Elections? MR. MELROSE: Absolutely, but that is between Elections and the State, because they need to know how itÓs going to happen. So we will assume that is going know what that is. So when we get them, I think we should wait until the deadline to review them, rather than to take them all individually. I think that between now and then, IÓd rather see us exercise our own thinking about the maps; making maps and talking about the implications of them. Then when the community sends their maps in, then we have a review of those, and I think we are supposed to make some cut on those; decide which ones make it into the public hearing or not. Not every one of them will go into the public hearing, IÓm presuming. 28