My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-09-00.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-09-00.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 9:05:17 AM
Creation date
10/6/2011 10:15:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. MIDDLESWORTH: Yes, you can do that too. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: It's a real puzzle. The way it's starting to look is that Puna will lose both <br />Kea`au and Volcano. It`s not just sacrificing one or the other any more; it's losing both ends. <br />MR. MELROSE: I think that is the question. You are going to have to lose Volcano, but you can <br />set this line in an upper and lower Puna scenario. Follow the Puna boundary and make District 4 <br />go all the way down to the shoreline of Puna and District 5 take up the lower Puna area. That <br />way Kea` au stays in Puna and all of Puna stays together, except for Volcano; and it does penetrate <br />quite a distance down there because it is so lightly populated. Puna is going to get its two votes; <br />the question is what happens to the 4,000 votes excess that they carry in population. <br />MR. MIDDLESWORTH: Exactly. <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: That is the - -- <br />MR. MELROSE: So, they are going to shed it in two directions; there are only two options. One <br />is that it sheds in a Hilo direction, and it shares those votes with Hilo, or it goes in the Ka`u <br />direction, or both to some degree. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Another way is to just disregard those predictions for future growth and don't <br />have the lowest possible numbers for the Puna district. <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: Excuse me, Madam Chair, are you comfortable, being from Puna, <br />saying that we don't need to make the adjustments for growth and that you would like to get the <br />1,000 votes back there. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Right now, the way the numbers are looking, it looks like we might have to <br />make that decision. No. I'm not comfortable with it, but there are a lot of things in my life I am <br />not comfortable with. <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: I just need to know your train of thought so that we don't -- -I've been <br />quiet during this whole thing, because I don't particularly care where District 4 went, but I'm <br />prepared to look at what is going to happen. What I'm looking at, at this particular point in time, <br />District 3 has always been the Hilo district that had part of Puna. What I'm trying to say is it <br />would be now that a smaller part of Hilo could now be in Puna. Or a smaller part of Puna be in <br />the bigger part of Hilo. Do you follow my train of thought? Now, Hilo, District 3, the majority <br />of votes are in Hilo with some in Puna. The reverse can happen, where the majority of votes are <br />in Puna, with parts of District 3 in Hilo. That's basically how I see it off of Plan _10. But, we will <br />discuss that when we move to the other map. That's why I'm asking if you are comfortable with <br />that? I think Mike has made that one compromise by making room for growth. But if you are <br />saying that we should just stay with numbers - -- <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: I think the adjustments for growth are one of the least important of the many <br />criteria that we have to try to balance. <br />W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.