My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-16 Leeward Exh A - Towata Grand
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-02-16 Leeward Exh A - Towata Grand
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2012 1:33:25 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 1:33:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ARAI: That is correct. I’m just looking at Condition E now, and I know Deputy Corp Counsel has <br />mentioned this, but it was making sure that these improvements are tied in, or there is a timing <br />mechanism in it. Now, normally these improvements are always applied at the time of subdivision, <br />because the whole purpose of this rezoning is for subdivision. But I’m just looking at the condition <br />now, and I’m just wondering if we need to make a more specific reference that “shall be provided <br />prior to final subdivision approval,” or something to that effect. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Madam Director, do you want to give input? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I think if you have language that says, you know, “if it becomes one-way prior <br />to final subdivision approval -.” <br /> <br />ARAI: Okay, let me work on something, but at this point, you can go ahead and discuss. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Good. Commissioners, do I hear any discussion? You can express your feelings about <br />the four options that Daryn spoke of, and then maybe before actually Daryn can come up with some <br />final wording on option four, we can have consensus amongst us. So if there is any comment -. <br />Commissioner. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Yes, Madam Chair. Looking at Exhibit 4, the proposal is to take 12.5 feet off of the <br />makai portion of the applicant’s property. Is that correct? <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Daryn, is that correct? <br /> <br />ARAI: Public Works is recommending 12.5 feet entirely on the mauka side, so it’s going to take <br />that 12.5-foot strip from the property. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: But it’s the makai side of the applicant’s property. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Right. <br /> <br />ARAI: Yeah, I’m sorry, yeah, makai side of the applicant’s property, right. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: And this would be to accommodate – 50-foot, no, 12.5 and 25 is 37.5. <br /> <br />ARAI: Plus twelve feet on the -. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: There’s another 12.5 -. <br /> <br />ARAI: Yeah, plus 12.5 on the makai side eventually, should it happen. That’s why -. We are <br />splitting the difference. It’s 12.5 feet now. You need an additional 25 to make 50, but because <br />there is a mauka, makai side of the road, we split it to 12.5 just to be fair to owners on both sides of <br />the road. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: I see. Now, from an engineering perspective, if you were to take the south-west corner <br />of the Towata’s property, and kind of like did a horseshoe thing as opposed to going the entire <br />length of the property, would then that not more sufficiently address the intersection issues, the <br />transition? <br />23 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.