Laserfiche WebLink
<br />66 number of lanes and the number of new dwelling units. Projects may only be complete only for <br />67 the first phase or two lanes out of the four lanes. <br />68 <br />69 Hiram said that looking at each concurrency zone and the schedule for any and all improvements <br />70 be reviewed and listed to better analyze the real situation of each district. This would help <br />71 determine whether individual concurrency zones were moving ahead or were stalled. <br />72 Identify which projects are currently being held back from developing because of concurrency. <br />73 Understanding the current situation for each concurrency will assist the action committee in <br />74 better understanding the situation. Discussion continued. Planning asked the action committee <br />75 to look at the current situation concerning concurrency and to advise the Planning Director as to <br />76 any improvements that might be reviewed. <br />77 <br />78 Ken Melrose stated that he is disappointed in the interpretation by the Planning Department as <br />79 the CDP was never the intended to be a moratorium. Individual words or policies are being <br />80 interpreted outside of the context of the balance of the plan. Since the existing roads do not <br />81 connect, it became a priority to get connectivity. The overall strategy for transportation section <br />82 indicates widening, improving and extending major arterials as well as increasing connectivity <br />83 between existing and new developments. Single items should not be taken out of context; rather <br />84 the decisions should be based on the entire document. The intent was to put projects towards <br />85 connectivity as individual developers are responsible only for areas within their control. <br />86 Ken encourages the sub-committee to keep recommendations in context of the entire document. <br />87 <br />88 Bennett Mark stated that this is the role of the action committee to advise the Planning Director. <br />89 There is disagreement within the Planning Department as to how these concurrency items are to <br />90 be interpreted. <br />91 <br />92 Ken Melrose mentioned the financing plan prepared for these infrastructure improvements was <br />93 prepared and never acted upon by the County government. Bennett said that the action <br />94 committee could help guide the Planning Director to ask the Mayor how this can go forward to <br />95 implement parts if not all of these proposed improvements. <br />96 <br /> 3 <br /> <br />