Laserfiche WebLink
<br />97 Greg Ogin summarized by indicating that the problem is not whether concurrency is needed <br />98 rather the problem seems to be how it is being interpreted. Greg thinks that maybe its time to <br />99 issue a letter to the Planning Department to basically reanalysis the implementation of <br />100 concurrency as it was intended. This should be introduced to the public for their input as well. <br />101 Hopefully a plan can be accomplished on concurrency. <br />102 <br />103 Ken Melrose mentioned that some pieces of highway can never be built. Keep this in context. <br />104 Ken offered to assist in the forming of a motion to deal with concurrency. Bennett offered <br />105 planning personnel to assist with any questions or to help the sub-committee. The sub- <br />106 committee which was formed at the last meeting consists of: Hiram Rivera, Elaine Fukushima, <br />107 Marnie Herkes and Ken Melrose are offering to join the sub-committee as of this meeting. <br />108 <br />109 Greg Ogin stated that the letter is to the Planning Director indicating what was intended by the <br />110 CDP on concurrency. Douglas Payne suggests that we go to the original source and determine <br />111 what was intended by the CDP. Discussion followed on policy and segments as it pertains to <br />112 certain policy statements. <br />113 <br />114 Recommend that the draft letter be distributed to the action committee as soon as possible so that <br />115 members of the action committee can be prepared to discuss the letter at the following meeting. <br />116 <br />117 Discussion about the draft letter to the Chief Justice was led by Bo Kahui with an explanation of <br />118 the purpose of the letter. Additional sites are also being considered by the Judiciary. Bo <br />119 recommends that process take its course. Greg Ogin questioned why the action committee is <br />120 recommending action to the Chief Justice. Greg will give a copy of the letter to Hiram to review <br />121 under the land use sub-committee. Greg asked that a copy of the draft letter be sent to each <br />122 member of the action committee for review and comment.. Bo asked that this item remain on the <br />123 agenda for next meeting. <br />124 <br />125 Chapters 23 & 25 are still under review by the Planning Department. <br />126 <br />127 Discussion of mission statement goals and objectives of each sub-committee with the approval <br />128 of the action committee was also addressed. Action items from the rear of the CDP were <br /> 4 <br /> <br />