My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-09-11 Board of Ethics minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2013
>
2013-09-11 Board of Ethics minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 11:06:32 AM
Creation date
12/18/2013 10:57:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
employee gets written up should be written up on a policy. So I feel you should fight that, because it’ll clear your policy, too. And while I’m seeing you wanted to be disqualified from doing certain things, prior to when there’s no written, could do it, right? <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: That was my interpretation. Nothing’s written. <br /> <br /> MR. HISASHIMA: Now they come up with something in writing. The policy—if you violate the policy, that’s when you get violations, not on ethics rules or—that’s nothing. The violation of the policy carries more water, because now I can use that and also – <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: I agree. Yes, sir. <br /> <br /> MR. HENRICKS: I think what we’re trying to do is--I think he understands _________. We’re talking due process here, you see— <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: --I agree completely— <br /> <br /> MR. HENRICKS: --and really you have to stay within the lines of due process. You haven’t had due process, and you should be telling them I haven’t had due process and let’s see where that falls out. Let’s see where—if you’ve been wrong, you’ve been wrong, and that suspension may be totally bogus. But you have to go through due process to find that out. And an opinion from us at this time would be worthless. <br /> <br /> MR. ADAMS: See, I think that’s really the point. <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: I think I need to apologize. <br /> <br /> MR. ADAMS: It’s a timing issue from our perspective. <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: My concern is that I would have been fired before I had the chance to come here, because it was so— <br /> <br /> MR. HENRICKS: --They can’t fire you without due process, because they’ve got too many things that can happen to them. <br /> <br /> MR. DRUTAR: Well, they suspended me without citing policy, so – <br /> <br /> MR. HENRICKS: Well, to me when you talk about a suspension like 30 days, that’s ________. So they can’t just walk on that. I mean, they have to answer to that if they’re wrong. If they’re right, then you did something wrong. I don’t know that. <br /> <br /> MR. BALSIS: So in summary, Mike, I believe we’ve given you a lot of different advice on how to go about due process. It appears that you’ve already started it, because you’ve made your claim or dispute—
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.