My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-12-12 Minutes Salary Commission
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-12-12 Minutes Salary Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 10:27:09 AM
Creation date
2/27/2014 10:27:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission December 12, 2013 <br /> Ms.Nitahara referenced the first column of the tiered salary schedules. The "A-9" <br /> description relates to a"Safety Administrator" and band positions. She stated that <br /> we no longer have these positions in the salary executive pay plan and are able to <br /> delete the grade levels and make adjustments (SEE ATT. J). Ms.Nitahara <br /> mentioned that the Commissioners would not need to meet as often to discuss what <br /> needs to be done for a specific position because with the tiered salary schedule, <br /> you can give everyone an across-the-board increase or step movement. Also,the <br /> Administration can ask the Commission to give a certain department head a higher <br /> salary pay range. Again, there is flexibility with a tiered salary schedule. <br /> Chair Lundkvist stated that all of the information presented today will be taken <br /> under consideration by the subcommittee and Commission, and thanked <br /> Ms. Nitahara for her presentation. Ms. Toriano also thanked Ms.Nitahara. <br /> Ms. Toriano mentioned that with Ms.Nitahara's assistance,they had done some <br /> research in looking at the salary schedule and framework of the exempt salaries, <br /> which has been 20 years in the making. When the subcommittee is formed, she <br /> would like to go over what the framework was and how that criteria was <br /> established and, hopefully, address some of the shortcomings that the salary <br /> schedule had presented when it was implemented. <br /> (At this time, Commissioner Brian De Lima stepped in.) <br /> Ms. Stroh wanted a clearer picture regarding the inconsistencies in the salary <br /> schedule concerning the positions and asked whether this was a step plan put in <br /> place or was it because of who the mayor was at that time. <br /> Ms. Toriano replied that there is only x-number of positions that can be allocated <br /> to the salary schedule,which hasn't changed over time. Exempt positions are <br /> typically the directors and deputy directors as well as the mayor and his managing <br /> director and deputy managing director. <br /> Ms. Stroh inquired whether the collective bargaining process drives the pay scale. <br /> Ms. Toriano stated that she thinks the collective bargaining influences how <br /> commissions visit the compensation schedule for the exempt positions. <br /> Historically,when there is an increase for collective bargaining,the schedule is <br /> revisited because of the exempts or leadership group—what are we going to do <br /> about them? <br /> Ms. Stroh responded that she wants a clearer picture on the step plan and the salary <br /> schedule, and when the subcommittee meets, they would have a broader <br /> perspective of the inconsistencies. <br /> Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.