My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-02-26 KCDP Minutes Final
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2009 - 2015
>
2014
>
2014-02-26 KCDP Minutes Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2014 1:32:13 PM
Creation date
4/3/2014 1:32:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />144 <br /> <br />145 <br /> <br />146 <br /> <br />147 <br />Keola Childs pointed out that under Policy LU-2.8, of the KCDP, projects over 20 acres shall be <br />148 <br />permitted to develop as a neighborhood TND following the procedures for a PUD and the Village <br />149 <br />Design Guidelines. Also Non-TND projects, with existing zoning, is subject to requirements for <br />150 <br />Parks, affordable housing, street standards, wastewater, concurrency and sensitive resources. <br />151 <br /> <br />152 <br />Hiram noted that if the concurrency process is stalled, we need to move forward to resolve the <br />153 <br />situation. Key to traffic congestion is to deal with the destination roads from north to south. <br />154 <br /> <br />155 <br />Ken Melrose noted that the County needs to decide its policy on whether the Alii Parkway should <br />156 <br />be abandoned and if so how that abandonment would impact the concurrency maps. <br />157 <br /> <br />158 <br />Douglas Payne wants to know when and where will the Action Committee address the financing <br />159 <br />plan. When can this be discussed? Ken pointed out that the “Financing Plan for Public Facilities <br />160 <br />and Backbone Infrastructure”, prepared on January 14, 2011 by Goodwin Consulting Group <br />161 <br />(GCG), was never approved or adopted by the County Council. The financing plan was adopted <br />162 <br />by the action committee and submitted it to the Planning Director for implementation. <br />163 <br /> <br />164 <br />Douglas Payne suggested that a sub-committee be established to deal with financing for the CDP. <br />165 <br />Finance must be in line with the development for the system to work. Greg asked for discussion <br />166 <br />on this possible finance committee. Douglas indicated that the County needs to identify the <br />167 <br />funding mechanism for the financing plan to proceed. Each neighborhood needs to have a road <br />168 <br />improvement district identified to move forward with funding. <br />169 <br /> <br />170 <br />Keola suggested that a mission be established for a finance sub-committee so that a clear goal can <br />171 <br />be designated for that group. Doug recommended we discuss this at the next meeting. Ken <br />172 <br />recommended we invite Dave Freudenberger, principal with GCG, to present highlights from the <br />173 <br />financing plan at our next scheduled meeting. Ken noted that the financing tools have not kept <br />174 <br />pace with the CDP. <br />175 <br />176 <br />Elaine Fukushima suggested that financing numbers be added to these handouts to make everyone <br />177 <br />aware of the costs for each item. Ken noted that there are Federal, State and County level funding <br />178 <br />and we need to coordinate these funding sources. <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.