Laserfiche WebLink
<br />109 <br />the small property owners to proceed without having to wait for all the roads to be <br />110 <br />complete. <br />111 <br />Ken said it’s a financing plan issue for concurrency. The plan needs to help the County go <br />· <br />112 <br />after the pieces we need to be more workable. <br />113 <br />Doug Payne spoke on the need for a financing plan to be the tool to make the roads a <br />· <br />114 <br />reality. The costs for the private developer are too great for them to finance the public <br />115 <br />road system for the entire area. The roads should have priority based on community needs. <br />116 <br />Perhaps a plan to allow the property owner and the County to work out a plan for <br />117 <br />contribution to the road connectivity needs towards concurrency could be a possibility. <br />118 <br />Ken Melrose said we need to work with Planning and Public Works to resolve this <br />· <br />119 <br />situation so that development can continue. The concurrency map has too many projects. <br />120 <br />Hiram discussed existing zoning from page 4-45 of the KCDP which references items that <br />· <br />121 <br />must comply with the CDP including concurrency. Also the Zoning code, section 25-2-46 <br />122 <br />also addresses concurrency. This section deals with rezoning to a higher density. Doug <br />123 <br />said that in 4-32 of the KCDP it states that this does not invalidate existing zoning. This is <br />124 <br />a problem in that there seems to be conflicts between the two documents. <br />125 <br />Roger Harris said that you can not require a person to pay for improvements beyond the <br />· <br />126 <br />impact of his development. He should only be responsible for his pro-rata share. The <br />127 <br />concurrency is a moratorium. <br />128 <br />Hiram, how do we move forward with these problems? This needs to be worked out a the <br />· <br />129 <br />County level. We are stuck and we need to work it out. <br />130 <br /> d. Recommendations to proceed from here <br />131 <br />Doug Payne recommends that ad hoc sub-committee be established to deal with this issue. <br />· <br />132 <br />Combine transportation and land use sub-committees to create the new ad-hoc sub- <br />· <br />133 <br />committee, <br />134 <br />Doug Payne made a motion to create an ad-hoc sub-committee to research concurrency <br />· <br />135 <br />and the motion was seconded by Elaine Fukushima. All in favor. <br />136 <br />Members are: Doug Payne, Hiram Rivera, Keoki Schattauer and Elaine Fukushima. <br />137 <br />Several members of the public also volunteered. <br />· <br />138 <br />TOD subcommittee will meet to discuss National Park topic. Keoki Schattauer <br />· <br />139 <br />volunteered to also serve on this committee. <br />140 <br /> e. Report on Transportation and Public Facilities. Meeting with Warren Lee, Public Works <br />141 <br /> Director, meeting where Street Improvement Projects – Kailua-Kona were discussed. <br />142 <br /> Doug’s committee report includes the following four items: <br /> 4 <br /> <br />