My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-21 Leeward Exh C (SMA 16-063)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-04-21 Leeward Exh C (SMA 16-063)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2016 3:58:19 PM
Creation date
5/19/2016 3:58:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PATEL: Thanks. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. Ms. McMichael, this is your opportunity to explain why you should be <br />granted standing according to criteria Rule 4-6(b). Among other reasons, you are to testify why <br />your, why you clearly have a distinguishable interest from the general public and/or that even <br />though you do not have an interest, that this proposed action will cause actual or threatened <br />injury. Basically this is your opportunity to discuss your petition for standing in a contested case <br />hearing for this application. So please proceed. <br /> <br />S. MCMICHAEL: Why I stand out separated from the general public is because I’m adjacent to <br />the property for about 30 years. And I feel a deep connection to the property. And I have a lot <br />more to say than being cut off at three minutes, and I really need to speak to all of you and it <br />could take hours regarding the property. That’s my reason. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you, understood. Applicant, do you have any objections to the petition? <br /> <br />MENEZES: Is it possible that we can ask the petitioner a couple of questions? <br /> <br />UNGER: Can you please speak a little bit more clearly into the mike? <br /> <br />MENEZES: Is it possible to ask the petitioner a couple of questions? <br /> <br />UNGER: Yes. This is your opportunity. <br /> <br />MENEZES: Ms. McMichael, you say that you are an adjoining property owner in your petition, <br />is that right? <br /> <br />S. MCMICHAEL: Yes. <br /> <br />MENEZES: And do you live on that property? <br /> <br />S. MCMICHAEL: No, it’s a vacation rental just like you know it is. <br /> <br />MENEZES: So the property that is adjoining of the applicant’s property is used as vacation <br />rentals. <br /> <br />S. MCMICHAEL: Correct. <br /> <br />MENEZES: Okay — <br /> <br />UNGER: Excuse me, can I interrupt for a minute? Can you direct your questions to me? And <br />then I will relay them onto Simmy and ask her if she has a response or not. <br /> <br />MENEZES: Certainly. We have no further questions. <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.